|
todays unexpected news related image.
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Phil raa |
woman on phone
why not use something more relevent. like a picture of a tree. |
|
|
| Xenocreator_PG_ |
The article is about mobile phones & cancer; & it seems logical to have a picture of someone on a phone??
why a tree? :wtf: |
|
|
| Phil raa |
i can't believe they used such a radical pic for that story.
:eek:
why not have a picture of an armadillo, just to confuse the fluck out of everyone. and i would laugh, and i would be the only person laughing, because everyone else in the entire world (except for me) would be confused about why they used a pic of an armadillo in an article about phones.
and i'd keep laughing for a bit. then stop. |
|
|
| Ondrayce |
| But what you can't see is the still born fetus on the other side of her head. |
|
|
| Tranc3 |
| How is that picture not relevant? |
|
|
| Phil raa |
| i contacted them and they have agreed next time to use something more connected, and more 'normal' as a picture. a dancing octupus wearing a tutu with glowsticks. |
|
|
| |cEbLu3 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Phil raa
i can't believe they used such a radical pic for that story.
:eek:
why not have a picture of an armadillo, just to confuse the fluck out of everyone. and i would laugh, and i would be the only person laughing, because everyone else in the entire world (except for me) would be confused about why they used a pic of an armadillo in an article about phones.
and i'd keep laughing for a bit. then stop. |
+1
roffle
:tongue2 |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| Dont know wtf you're talking about, but it's funny :stongue: |
|
|
| Orbax |
| Do they have to ask people's permission to use these photos/ |
|
|
|
|
