|
x86 Assembly Language
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Noctone |
| So....don't suppose anyone knows much about programming in x86 assembly language do they? ): |
|
|
| Zenchowdah |
| assembly, thats hard core. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| 1001 0001 1111 1000 0010 1110 1010 1011 |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| 1111 + 111 + 111 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = ___________ |
|
|
| Dr. Cfire |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sunsnail
1111 + 111 + 111 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = ___________ |
Are these signed numbers? what is the number base
its 100000 if they are unsigned binary. |
|
|
| LeopoldStotch |
are you talking about those stinkin operands/opcodes, bytes, memory addresses, and junkie stuff ??
that's hardcore dude ..
get back with us when you can compile and transform loop statements from program language code to x86 bytecode format .. :nervous: .. |
|
|
| Subey |
| 42 = 101010 = * = Wild Card |
|
|
| AnotherWay83 |
| i've done both 16-bit and 32 bit assembly language programming for windows and i'm taking a class in that now...i actually like it lol |
|
|
| Geoff |
| quote: | Originally posted by AnotherWay83
i've done both 16-bit and 32 bit assembly language programming for windows and i'm taking a class in that now...i actually like it lol |
yea it's interesting to see real low lvl code like x86, u really get to see how computers function below all that abstraction |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dr. Cfire
Are these signed numbers? what is the number base
its 100000 if they are unsigned binary. |
ok, add them like normal real numbers |
|
|
| Cloudburst |
| Not x86 assembly, but we did MIPS in uni (used in PS etc). |
|
|
|
|
