|
Santiago Nino Octuber 2005 Mix (Download) (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Turner |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJlyall
Who exactly are you refering to? coz i aint got a clue? |
The person who i quoted. ;) |
|
|
| DJlyall |
| fair enough, thats not me then! |
|
|
| Wicked Neo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Turner
The person who i quoted. ;) |
behave or you know what will happen! |
|
|
| Turner |
| quote: | Originally posted by Wicked Neo
behave or you know what will happen! |
:stongue: :stongue: Yes i do, its happened many a time in the past. :haha: |
|
|
| Clovis86 |
| wtf...you cant OPEN with Aftermath :wtf: Thats like...against the law. |
|
|
| Vlad |
| quote: | Originally posted by Clovis86
wtf...you cant OPEN with Aftermath :wtf: Thats like...against the law. |
I could be wrong, but I think people who put tracks like that in the beginning of a set, have problems mixing into the track or cant find a track to mix into it with, but yet they have to put the track in their mix and the easiest way to accomplish that is to just stick it in the front. :p |
|
|
| Stu Cox |
| quote: | Originally posted by Clovis86
wtf...you cant OPEN with Aftermath :wtf: Thats like...against the law. |
If you actually listen to the mix (which I think sometimes people don't even bother doing before commenting on it!) I think it works really well.
This is why I dislike the whole 'tracklist culture', where every mix needs a tracklist before anyone will listen to it... people end up judging a mix simply from what tracks are in what order based on certain "rules" they think exist, even though a good DJ can use the way they mix two tracks together to make almost anything work. I heard a mix a little while ago with someone starting on 150bpm hard trance and finishing on 135bpm breaks, working down through trance in between, but because of the way the mixes were done, no energy was lost going from one track to the next. |
|
|
| dinoXpress |
| Yeha, which is why my demo owns. :p |
|
|
| Vlad |
| quote: | Originally posted by Stu Cox
If you actually listen to the mix (which I think sometimes people don't even bother doing before commenting on it!) I think it works really well.
This is why I dislike the whole 'tracklist culture', where every mix needs a tracklist before anyone will listen to it... people end up judging a mix simply from what tracks are in what order based on certain "rules" they think exist, even though a good DJ can use the way they mix two tracks together to make almost anything work. I heard a mix a little while ago with someone starting on 150bpm hard trance and finishing on 135bpm breaks, working down through trance in between, but because of the way the mixes were done, no energy was lost going from one track to the next. |
Anyone can do anything they want with the tracks they play at their own discretion, but in the case of Aftermath, right now, its a hot peak hour track that everyone wants to hear and sticking it in the front could take away from the track and the mix. |
|
|
| Clovis86 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Stu Cox
If you actually listen to the mix (which I think sometimes people don't even bother doing before commenting on it!) I think it works really well.
This is why I dislike the whole 'tracklist culture', where every mix needs a tracklist before anyone will listen to it... people end up judging a mix simply from what tracks are in what order based on certain "rules" they think exist, even though a good DJ can use the way they mix two tracks together to make almost anything work. I heard a mix a little while ago with someone starting on 150bpm hard trance and finishing on 135bpm breaks, working down through trance in between, but because of the way the mixes were done, no energy was lost going from one track to the next. |
Sure it might not sound bad...but Aftermath SHINES at 4:30 in the morning on a packed dancefloor in a dark club on a huge system. Even cranked loud at home on good speakers it is not the same. The track is MEANT to be played in the aforementioned setting.
I am all for breaking the rules...but this doesnt look like an "oh lets try something really interesting" rule breakage, it sounds like "oh this track is massive but it doesnt fit with anything else here...badabing"
Digweed, Sasha etc will drop this at 4:30am and make the club explode. There is a reason for this... |
|
|
| Mike_Foyle |
| to be honest i cant stand the track anyway, no matter what time it's played hehe. for me it's no where near as special as everyone seems to make out... |
|
|
| DJlyall |
| i agree, but i do have a copy myself, its nothing spectacular, ive heard better,i think the build up in the break is a bit long, but dropped at the right time, it could do some damage on the dance floor! |
|
|
|
|
