return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > Canada > Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Digital Cameras? (pg. 2)
View this Thread in Original format
chinamon
quote:
Originally posted by djbruuen
when i look at ppl's picks from places like guv...sometimes they like they get blurry in places and others, look crystal sharpness (i obviously want one like the latter)


thats what happens when you use slow shutter.
it really depends on the lighting situation when you are taking the picture. if the shutter stays on for a long period of time, it will look more blurry because the camera catches more of the people moving..
unfortunately, slow shutter is the best way to take a picture of club lighting.
simms327
after owning two canons, powershot S200 and SD230, i will never buy anything else.

canons take clean crisp beautiful pictures, are small, durable, and have good battery life. for a point and shoot camera, IMO there is no better.
Wyndham
quote:
Originally posted by simms327
after owning two canons, powershot S200 and SD230, i will never buy anything else.

canons take clean crisp beautiful pictures, are small, durable, and have good battery life. for a point and shoot camera, IMO there is no better.


lol i can't count the amount of times i've dropped mine on floors of clubs.

and as far as shutter speed goes, the bigger the lense, the more light it lets through, the less time the shutter needs to be open. Thats why if you go too small, theres just nothing you can do about blurryness.

i still say the the sd500 is a bit overboard, sd400 or 450 is a better choice unless the cash isn't an issue
Shaya007
As far as compacts go, I also give a big thumbs up to Sony!

;) ;) 7
niveole
quote:
Originally posted by malek
tiny cameras and good club pics don't go together ;)


+1
TRANCEEEE









these pics i think are good enough , i mean, you're looking for sharp pics. i think the sony P93A cybershot which is my cam is pretty good


looks kindda like that 5 mega pixel :nervous:
SgtFoo
Yeah I'm in the market for a digi cam too.

I'd like between 5 and 6 MPs, 3x optical zoom at least, 1GB mem card capacity, movie-mode with sound (limited to card size only, no time limit like 30 secs or some crap like that), and USB2.0 interface.

I can't seem to decide on one because there's so many possiblitities. Any1 got any suggestions? I'll most likely get from EBay.

..and what the difference between the memory cards?
djbruuen
^ check out the ebay auction i listed on the last page...the sd500 is 7.1mp and it has everything you said, + the package comes with 1gb of mem
chinamon
quote:
Originally posted by TRANCEEEE









these pics i think are good enough , i mean, you're looking for sharp pics. i think the sony P93A cybershot which is my cam is pretty good


looks kindda like that 5 mega pixel :nervous:


i own a sony dsc-w5 and i love it.
i used to own a sony dsc-p72 and it was a great camera too.
shaya knows how i feel about sony's. :D
SgtFoo
quote:
Originally posted by djbruuen
^ check out the ebay auction i listed on the last page...the sd500 is 7.1mp and it has everything you said, + the package comes with 1gb of mem


oops, I prolly should have mentionned that my budget is $150 to $300 CDN + shipping.

Billche
if size is an issue, the SD500 is a great camera. My cousin has one, and it takes excellent pictures. If size is not as much of an issue, or cost, then I would go with one of cannons S series cameras. I have a friend with an S70, and it takes phenomenal pictures. The quality of the lens surpasses any of the compact pocketsize cameras, and it really isnt that much larger. It has an assload of features that you would expect only on an SLR, and works great.

The latest version, the S80, is a little sleeker, and has a higher resolution (8 megapixel) although it is fairly pricy.
Wyndham
keep in mind megapixels has no relation to the quality of the picture anymore...this misconception started from when cameras were 1/2 mpix, 1mpix etc. 3mpix is all you really need, can print an 8x10 with no quality loss. If you're going to be cropping and editing then 5 is good, anything over 5 is a waste of money unless its got a better lense or features as well.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Privacy Statement