|
Signature size .
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Purple |
| Should be increased to 300k. |
|
|
| Elude |
i'm just sure people on 56k would love that
|
|
|
| Boomer187 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Elude
i'm just sure people on 56k would love that
|
there are people on 56k? |
|
|
| Swamper |
| Not gonna happen. |
|
|
| zoric |
| quote: | Originally posted by Boomer187
there are people on 56k? |
My thought too.. |
|
|
| InterMilan31 |
| who the hell has 56k still |
|
|
| stevieboy32808 |
I...............(buffering)..............do.
Nah, I kid. |
|
|
| paranoik0 |
I really don't want to download 10 MB every time i click on a thread. No, i'm not on a 56k, that has been a long time ago, but still on (low) broadband it would take an unacceptable time. And considering my uni's "big and stable" bandwidth, it would make browsing TA over there impossible.
Besides, what's the point of allowing heavy signatures? Are you gonna sign every one of your posts with fantastic flash animations? Why in hell would you want 300k for such a small space? |
|
|
| Purple |
| quote: | | Originally posted by paranoik0 Are you gonna sign every one of your posts with fantastic flash animations? |
Yes. It will change the whole look on this website, and first web forum forum as such to have such amazing signatures.
I am not much a techology geek, but I think first time you open TA, the signature gets stored in your cache, and next time it just pulls itself from cache instead of downloading from internet. |
|
|
| InterMilan31 |
| paranoik's just jealous he cant make a super cool Postiga flash sig :haha: |
|
|
|
|
