return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > USA > USA - West Coast / Las Vegas

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 
Which city is better San Francisco or LA?
View this Thread in Original format
josh4
I'm moving to Cali and have a choice between the two. LA is probably the bigger city but it has its draw backs. I hear San Francisco's public transportation isn't all that great and I'd need a car.
SVGmethod
LA hands down....cuz we're getting sasha and zabiela!!!!!!!!!!!
HotDogWater
Actually, I think you'd need a car in LA before you need a car in SF. What else are you looking for? The SF guys always seem to be jealous of us ;), so I'd say EDM-wise there's more stuff going on down here.
josh4
quote:
Originally posted by HotDogWater
What else are you looking for?

Don't ask me these things because I'm not really sure. I know I want to move to Cali and I know it'd either be one of these cities. What's good/bad about them?
DaveT
You don't need a car in SF....not really at all. I didn't have any access to a car for the first 5 years I lived here and never really had any complaints.

Tons of peeps I know who do have cars here don't even use them because parking is so hard to find and/or too expensive in the city.

LA certainly has a ton more stuff going on, but the people in SF seems to be more educated about the music. And I think the vibe is better here, mainly because in LA you have sweaty dudes wiping all over you or you are constantly being washed away by the washing machines on the floor.
Dj onE
San Diego :tongue3



.dJonE.
SVGmethod
it....just move to santa barbara. the best place on earth. LOL.
Boomer187
I love san fran, it is really a cool place with tons of stuff (not just edm related) to do. Id move there in a second (after I get a high paying job offer, its expensive)


I don't like LA, they get the best shows, but driving around there sucks. plus its expensive :P.



San Diego rocks. I like that city a lot. :wtf:



or go to vega......nah, nevermind, go to LA :D
dj_bas
quote:
Originally posted by josh4
I'm moving to Cali and have a choice between the two. LA is probably the bigger city but it has its draw backs. I hear San Francisco's public transportation isn't all that great and I'd need a car.

Neither, don't move here.
tk422
I live in LA..


SF is 100x the city LA is....dont need a car for one..if you hate sitting in traffic forget LA.


SF is more expensive though...Weather is better too...but thats just me...

What do I know I like trance :P

Noree
quote:
Originally posted by tk422
SF is more expensive though...Weather is better too...but thats just me...



Weather? no way bro....LA is best weather in the world....hands down.....it rains like 10 times a year here lol, always sunny....think of it like this..... if u move to LA u have SF just above u.....San diego 2 hours away, which is close to mexico......Las Vegas like 3 hours away.......LA has more talent comin thru.....LA is a better pick...been l;iving here for years...and the only thing i hate about it is Traffic....and how "LA" some people are! thats about it.
dj_bas
quote:
Originally posted by Noree
and how "LA" some people are! thats about it.

And how sometimes when I go to Starbuck's and ask for a non-fat vanilla latte the ing moron behind the counter uses LOW fat milk...what an idiot!!! Move to SF, you won't have to deal with stupid Starbuck's employees and you'll be further from me.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 
Privacy Statement