|
all about carbon dating (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Fundamental |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
No, I don't believe I am 4 asterisk's. |
4 star. Pretty good. If you had better toilet facilities you might have got 5. |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by Marc Summers
Spell it out then.
C-u-n-t. |
Now now, I don't think a boy of your age should be using such big words. |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Now now, I don't think a boy of your age should be using such big words. |
My age? Boy?
Sorry, but I won't be part of your fantasy. I am 18, a bit old for your taste. |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by Marc Summers
My age? Boy?
Sorry, but I won't be part of your fantasy. I am 18, a bit old for your taste. |
Yeah, a mere teen. Younger than my younger brother. |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Yeah, a mere teen. Younger than my younger brother. |
Wow, you must be old. I bet your the creepy balding guy at the clubs, arent you? |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| Sure, if it makes you happy. |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
If it makes you happy
It can't be that bad
If it makes you happy
Then why the hell are you so sad |
:stongue:
I'm done, lol.
That just put me in a good mood. |
|
|
| DJFreaq |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
If it makes you happy
It can't be that bad
If it makes you happy
Then why the hell are you so sad |
DUDE ZOMG IS THAT TEH SHERYL CROW!!!
OMFG I <# HER
AND SHE'S DATING LANCE AMRSTRONG
this thread WAS about carbon dating, since it's so off topic, just let it die |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
| carbon dating is only good for dating in thousands of years. not millions. and a lot of scientists are so biased that they throw out an undesired "date" because it doesnt fit they're timeline. it pisses me off at how biased the evolutionists are when clearly their theory has some problems to it. do they try to explain the problems? no. they prefer to silence the questioners as "religious nuts". |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
carbon dating is only good for dating in thousands of years. not millions. and a lot of scientists are so biased that they throw out an undesired "date" because it doesnt fit they're timeline. it pisses me off at how biased the evolutionists are when clearly their theory has some problems to it. do they try to explain the problems? no. they prefer to silence the questioners as "religious nuts". |
Now you see Heinz, I believe your silence was self-imposed after we addressed every issue that you raised and pointed out that some of the sources you used had the academic credentials equivalent to McDonald's U. We were all breathlessly awaiting your response but alas, we were destined for disappointment. If you had read the radiocarbon thread, you would have seen acknowledgement that they don't use carbon dating past 50,000 years but instead use a different radiometric dating methodology such as argon-argon dating. Now I know you must be hard at work typing up all of your responses to the 20 or so evolution threads that you posted in in the PDD and then abruptly vanished, so I won't take up any more of your time. |
|
|
| Ian |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fundamental
4 star. Pretty good. If you had better toilet facilities you might have got 5. |
yeah, sadly everyone pisses all over Nik.
mr summers - you got banned because you kept ctcp flooding me on there, you kinda irritated the others, and there's 2 gay ppl there, who wanted to be gay & u said that was ok as long as it wasn't around you, don't take offense :) |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ian
yeah, sadly everyone pisses all over Nik.
|
Some might call it a fetish.
Er... I mean...
Nevermind...
:nervous: |
|
|
|
|
