|
girls with wet nikers (320 kb full frontal)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| covert23 |
girls with wet nikers a new creation by covert23...please comment....good/bad all feedback helps.....full 320kb...
six minuites long....hope its an improvement on my last choon
please respond people ........thanks michael.......
heres the link......you might have to paste it into your browser.. sorry for the inconvenience
http://s62.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=1Z017JBC8PP972VMI4ECP5IX6F
hope you like ..... |
|
|
| covert23 |
| yes/no it works/it doesnt some feedback please much apreciated |
|
|
| Chronosis |
Heh. Be patient. :)
Well, it's a quite hard track. I have friends who would surely jam like crazy to this at their all-night, on-speed, traktor sessions. Not exactly my taste though. |
|
|
| bidor |
| first thing that came to mind is that this track distorts a lot. try and fix that:) intro was a bit short i find it it needs a bit more work, overall it was quite ok. the ending also needs a lil attention. but dont give up, keep up the good work!:) |
|
|
| covert23 |
| will take another look at its distortion levels.... the intro and outro thanks for the ears chaps |
|
|
| dmitri_vaganov |
| I like the hard sounding elemnts in the track. I think it's missing a structure. No ups and downs. Add more effects. |
|
|
| DJ Balti |
Hey,
One observation from the intro from a personal point of view is that things build a bit on the quick side, maybe try letting things breathe a bit more by introducing them more subtlely. Really liking the stage after 2 mins, the track really comes into its own here and nothing comes in too unexpectedly. The percussion stays the same from what I've heard so maybe a bit of variation on that front would be good.
Production wise everything sounds good just a couple of things that need ironing out really. |
|
|
| BOOsTER |
cool, but give it some more breathing room :)
also I think it clips ;)
didn't check though |
|
|
| iloop |
from the spectrum analyser it looks like it hits some clipping... other than that it has some good melodic elements and is harder w/ the synths which i like, but the buildup/arrangement side could be worked on a bit... Outro/into could be more dj friendly too if you introduce/outroduce elements more smoothly.
:thepirate YAR thats my critical r-view |
|
|
| ralpheeee |
I realy liked it dude. Much better than my track.
That chord that keeps on playing in the first two mins get a bit repetitve except when u do that progresion which i thought was good, you could always use that progresion a few more times.Maybe even loop that progresion.
Heeps cool track keep up the good work.
:D :) :stongue: :gsmile: :toocool: :tongue2 :tongue3 :crazy: |
|
|
| covert23 |
| ill do some more work on the intro and the clipping,thanks for the comments...........the more pears of ears the better anybody else got comments much apreciated....thanks..... |
|
|
| nhibberd |
Listening...
Where did you get those effect samples from? All in all, well produced imo. A little experience won't go amiss though. I must say it isn't something I would buy. It would probably fit well in someones tech set as a trancy interlude, but not on a busy night.
Lot's of standard techniques in the track that are done millions of times. Like the reverse cymbol. If you want to earn a little more respect for the track work on that. Try adding a revers reverb to the cymbol in place of just reversing it. Or even better if you get some noise going and go crazy with some filters.
Another thing is that elements seems to just start and stop in the sequence. Try filtering something in or creating an introduction to a riff.
Overall, my taste is a bit different. I prefer more clean and harmonious sounds.
Ok, that's it. Sorry for righting a book here. Be sure to click the 'review' link in my signature.
kind regards,
Charlie Darwin |
|
|
|
|
