|
New Winamp 5.2 x86 (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Kato |
| quote: | Originally posted by THE_Chris
I upgraded just to get rid of the goddamn upgrade box.
|
Then uncheck the check for upgrades at start up box, problem solved. |
|
|
| Illuminati |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nayil
i use WMP .... sounds more atmospheric when i use my bose headphones. The bass really kicks in |
Well, just adjust the equalizer in winamp! Problem solved!
You can use the present “laptop speakers / headphones” or adjust the eq manually. |
|
|
| DJ Cinos |
foobaaaaaaarrr!
Better sound, quicker, nicer. ftw!
...and Apollo for mp3s. |
|
|
| skip |
| one of the best things in winamp IMO is the ability to enqueue tracks from the playlist to be played next. does foobar or apollo offer this? |
|
|
| mentalbarter |
| quote: | Originally posted by _Nut_
I do think that in many years... this is the first smile ive seen from you. |
:D |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by _Nut_
I do think that in many years... this is the first smile ive seen from you. |
It's adorable you've kept track of my postings, but I guess you just missed about 50% of them. |
|
|
| Purple |
| quote: | Originally posted by skip
one of the best things in winamp IMO is the ability to enqueue tracks from the playlist to be played next. does foobar or apollo offer this? |
No for Apollo. Dont know about Foobar.
But the output sound quality in Apollo is much better than what you get from Winamp. |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
But the output sound quality in Apollo is much better than what you get from Winamp. |
Better how, exactly? |
|
|
| Purple |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Better how, exactly? |
You see Winamp is generalised as a software which plays all file formats like wav, mpeg etc... so it plays same quality for all.
But Apollo is 'optimised' for playing only mp3 tracks, so the user end sound quality is much better than what I used to get from winamp.
You will realise that Apollo sounds much better once you download and listen to same track played in winamp and than apollo.
For more info in better english you can check the thread mentioned in first post of second page of this thread. |
|
|
| DJ Legs |
WTH IS THIS?!?!?!??!?!!
<3<3<3<3<3 NOTHING |
|
|
| rockster77 |
| quote: | Less than a month after releasing a security update to Winamp, Nullsoft has delivered a new version of the media player to plug serious bugs. Winamp 5.2, issued Thursday, tackles a vulnerability in the software's handling of m3u playlist files, according to a developer posting on an online forum from Nullsoft, a division of America Online.
An attacker could put together a specially crafted m3u playlist to cause the computer to crash when the user pauses or stops play, according to an advisory from Secunia. It may also allow an intruder to execute code. The "highly critical" flaw affects the most recent versions of Winamp, versions 5.12 and 5.13, the security company said. |
http://news.com.com/Winamp+update+f...ml?tag=nefd.hed |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
You see Winamp is generalised as a software which plays all file formats like wav, mpeg etc... so it plays same quality for all.
But Apollo is 'optimised' for playing only mp3 tracks, so the user end sound quality is much better than what I used to get from winamp.
You will realise that Apollo sounds much better once you download and listen to same track played in winamp and than apollo.
For more info in better english you can check the thread mentioned in first post of second page of this thread. |
No, what I mean is what do you mean by "better sound quality" exactly? What I want from a player is to be able to play the original track as close to the original sound quality as that, and when I play CD's with WinAmp it sounds exactly the same as playing the CD's in a CD player... so if the player alters the sound somehow that's not what I want. |
|
|
|
|
