|
Big boys of iraq putting the hurting on the marines (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by erdega
Isn't it amazing how a bunch of desert dwelling illiterate buffoons is killing the mightiest army on earth. They are not riding so high now. There is more to come later
|
Yes, It's amazing, but horrible. You're acting as if american soldiers deserve to be killed. Not cool. You have alot to learn. |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
you haven't been programmed to understand. |
Right and you have? |
|
|
| Lepanto |
only an idiot with no knowledge of military history would think that the insurgency have a slight chance against the marines. even when they fight like little B I T C H E S. They don't have the balls to fight like real M E N. they put up human shields of women and kids. PANSYS.
and USMC > all. SEMPER FI! i'm glad my boys over there shreded these ******s like no tommorow.
if you think they have a chance against the best trained, physically, metally, psychologically, most battle-ready, most fanatical, bad ass mother******s on this earth you're sadly mistaken. :) |
|
|
| trancaholic |
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
Honestly? I think the will of the people is more important, and the will of Iraqi people is to fight the terror which US has brought to their lives.
These people were leaving in peace and had a perfect normal life. There was no targeting of schools, markets, mosques, cafe's, job lines and aid workers in Iraq before. US and its millitary brought it to them.
When US invades a country on pretext of lies, its not terrorism, its a 'war on terrorism'. And when Iraqies fight back this oppression its terrorism?
Make no mistake people, these people blasting US vehicle, these people making sniper attack on US soilders; are no terrorists. They are freedon fighters, army, martyrs... or whatever you like to call them; but no terrorists. |
Seeing as you're so much better informed about Iraq than the rest of us, that you don't even have to provide any justification for your claims, maybe you can answer me this:
The current government in Iraq is democratically elected, and it has abstained from asking the foreign troops to leave (in fact it even asked - in a formal letter - the Danish troops to stay last month). Why is this? As you've already claimed that "the will" of the Iraqis is to fight the US, and you're clearly not one to be mistaken about the citizens of a country thousands of miles from your place of residence, obviously we must conclude that the evil Iraqi government is acting in direct opposition to the true will of the Iraqi people. But why is this? And why do the Iraqis keep electing such bastards as their leaders? Why didn't they vote for people running on an agenda to make the foreign troops leave? It seems that when we combine your profound insight with trivial facts, only one conclusion can be drawn: Iraqis are stupid. Is that why they keep killing more Iraqis than Americans? |
|
|
| Purple |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
only an idiot with no knowledge of military history would think that the insurgency have a slight chance against the marines. even when they fight like little B I T C H E S. They don't have the balls to fight like real M E N. they put up human shields of women and kids. PANSYS.
and USMC > all. SEMPER FI! i'm glad my boys over there shreded these ******s like no tommorow.
if you think they have a chance against the best trained, physically, metally, psychologically, most battle-ready, most fanatical, bad ass mother******s on this earth you're sadly mistaken. :) |
Knowledge of Millitary history?
Afganistan and Vietnam . :)
| quote: | Originally posted by trancaholic
Seeing as you're so much better informed about Iraq than the rest of us, that you don't even have to provide any justification for your claims, maybe you can answer me this:
The current government in Iraq is democratically elected, and it has abstained from asking the foreign troops to leave (in fact it even asked - in a formal letter - the Danish troops to stay last month). Why is this? As you've already claimed that "the will" of the Iraqis is to fight the US, and you're clearly not one to be mistaken about the citizens of a country thousands of miles from your place of residence, obviously we must conclude that the evil Iraqi government is acting in direct opposition to the true will of the Iraqi people. But why is this? And why do the Iraqis keep electing such bastards as their leaders? Why didn't they vote for people running on an agenda to make the foreign troops leave? It seems that when we combine your profound insight with trivial facts, only one conclusion can be drawn: Iraqis are stupid. Is that why they keep killing more Iraqis than Americans? |
Allow the US branded 'terrorist organisations' to stand in elections and you will see a repeat of Hamas winning in Palestine. The current government is not of choice but by default (lack of choice). |
|
|
| Lepanto |
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
Knowledge of Millitary history?
Afganistan and Vietnam . :)
|
you can't even SPELL Afghanistan, dumbass. And what about Vietnam, why don't you go pull up the troops count, retard ;).
Shows how much you know of military history. And the word military is not capitalized.
Also, here's a lesson in the English language. If the government was by "default" there wouldnt've even BEEN AN ELECTION! |
|
|
| Purple |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
you can't even SPELL Afghanistan, dumbass. And what about Vietnam, why don't you go pull up the troops count, retard ;).
|
If you think troops count is a criteria on who wins the war, than you must also think Germany won the Wrold War 2. Sure they had lesser troop counts dead than entire EU, Russia and US combined.
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
Shows how much you know of military history. And the word military is not capitalized.
Also, here's a lesson in the English language. If the government was by "default" there wouldnt've even BEEN AN ELECTION! |
Blah blah blah... its a waste talking to you, you dont have anyy logic and pick up small typos and stuff to defend yourself. Stupid go ahead and have the last word on it. |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
Afganistan and Vietnam . :)
|
Vietnam was Army, primarily. Rushed, and ill-experienced due to the draft.
Iraq is marines, which are highly trained, compared to the drafted army boys in vietnam. |
|
|
| Lepanto |
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
If you think troops count is a criteria on who wins the war, than you must also think Germany won the Wrold War 2. Sure they had lesser troop counts dead than entire EU, Russia and US combined.
Blah blah blah... its a waste talking to you, you dont have anyy logic and pick up small typos and stuff to defend yourself. Stupid go ahead and have the last word on it. |
it's funny how you claim i pick up typos yet you reply with "blah blah blah" :rolleyes: :haha:.
so if i'm wrong about the troop count tell me why Vietnam is an exception? Maybe because of it's media cover and the loss of support for the war when the troops pulled out, you mistake of nature? and no marines there;)
Back to the point that you do not know military history. No one knows how many russians died in WWII, fool. :haha: |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
Knowledge of Millitary history?
Afganistan and Vietnam . :)
|
Um, Afghanistan is under the jurisdiction of the Eurocorps, sorry.
If you threw in Vietnam is just confuse the situation, you did; that's a totally different situation, on a different timeline and has no relevance to this arguement.
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
Honestly? I think the will of the people is more important, and the will of Iraqi people is to fight the terror which US has brought to their lives.
|
Like South Korea, Kuwait, West Germany and South Vietnam for example?
Those that have been liberated from oppression have done very well for themselves.
It only took a peek over the border to see whos style of government really works and who helped them to acheive that.
With your agruement, you probably would think dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan was 'terrorism' too.
The West was quick to rectify that situation with billions of dollars worth in loans and Japan became a leading manufacturer in the world.
| quote: |
Allow the US branded 'terrorist organisations' to stand in elections and you will see a repeat of Hamas winning in Palestine. The current government is not of choice but by default. |
What??
The government was freely elected by the people of Iraq, not some puppet regime.
Simply side-stepping thier whole electoral process so you can try and make your point is ignorant indeed...
 |
|
|
| trancaholic |
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
Allow the US branded 'terrorist organisations' to stand in elections and you will see a repeat of Hamas winning in Palestine. The current government is not of choice but by default (lack of choice). |
I'm probably being totally unreasonable here, but would you be so kind to present a little, you know, evidence? Who are the knights of truth that were denied the right to run? And upon what do you base your assertion that, if these were allowed to run, they would have won in a landslide victory?
Btw. Wikipedia, states that the december elections offered only 228 lists for the poor Iraqis to choose from. Lack of choice indeed. Of course, this outrageously low number would be much more tolerable if all the poor US-branded "terrorist organizations" were allowed to run. A bit odd that organizations such as the SCIRI are allowed to run by the US overlords, though. One would think that organizations with close ties to the Axis-of-Evil Mullahs of Iran would be banned from running in the brutal US-dictatorship that is Iraq? |
|
|
| Lepanto |
| That's cause purple and his dear friend trancer are the best example of Mujahideen jihad-mongers. |
|
|
|
|
