|
best Software (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| staticblue |
| quote: | Originally posted by Liran-A
But I still in a mind that a professional producer (like Armin, Marco V) have to work with a more powerful program like Logic\Cubase :)
Don't you agree with me? |
Well, they dont HAVE to, but it seems like Armin and Marco V chose the program they prefered and it was a good choice for them since they have made some great stuff with it :)
That doesn't mean it has to be a reference program for the next 40 years though, there are other great pieces of software out there ;) |
|
|
| Aquascape |
I'm a FL user and it's definitely a very good app, capable of producing excellent, very professional results. However it does have limits and I believe for most people, fully fledged sequencers like Cubase and Sonar offer more possibilities if they intend to go totally 100% 'Ferry Corsten' professional. However the argument as to whether FL can exist in a professional setup rests with the producer in question and if it suits their way of working.
I don't see the point in upgrading from FL Studio to Reason tbh. They are both software studios and although Reason is more expensive, I think this is because Reason comes with better instruments and effects initially. FL Studio is VST compatible (Reason isn't) and after purchasing it you can look to third party companies for better quality stuff if you want it. So they're very much on par. |
|
|
| Storyteller |
| quote: | Originally posted by thoughtlessjex
And BT uses Reason. |
Try not to forget all the other stuff. Like tons of VST's as well. |
|
|
| djglacial |
| quote: | Originally posted by Aquascape
I'm a FL user and it's definitely a very good app, capable of producing excellent, very professional results. However it does have limits and I believe for most people, fully fledged sequencers like Cubase and Sonar offer more possibilities if they intend to go totally 100% 'Ferry Corsten' professional. However the argument as to whether FL can exist in a professional setup rests with the producer in question and if it suits their way of working. |
What does cubase have over FL?
You say fully-fledged sequencers... so far the only thing I don't like about FL is the inability to reset the playlist grid to follow a measure that has been moved ahead or behind by a bar or a beat... and the inability to cut patterns in half. Other than that, I can't see anything for want.
Routing could be improved, but I can't see it happenning. The infrastructure's not there. There could be workarounds, but I think the creators are ... stubborn.
[edit]
And I'm not trying to be contrary, I know I improve with every new working environment. New interfaces help you become more resourceful. |
|
|
| WiKKid sKiLLz |
cubase looks very tasty to me...
i think i might buy it in about a month |
|
|
| ronk |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
eJay. |
+1
great features, supports vsts, professional interface, great sound engine etc..the best software out there. |
|
|
| WiKKid sKiLLz |
Rave eJay is better than eJay by far
it has 192k sampling over infinite virtual tracks, AND it runs on LINUX |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by WiKKid sKiLLz
Rave eJay is better than eJay by far
it has 192k sampling over infinite virtual tracks, AND it runs on LINUX |
Er... Rave eJay is eJay... |
|
|
| WiKKid sKiLLz |
| rave ejay is an ejay software, but it is not the newer ejay program |
|
|
| WiKKid sKiLLz |
i know because i used it when i was bored, back in '98 :x
how embarassing!
the jungle loops are pretty satisfying though :eek: |
|
|
|
|
