|
Big Brother (BB <3 6) (pg. 27)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| jizza |
soups they didnt use their real names because there's 3 michael's in this series (ashley being the other one).
i feel sorry for the boys that the word sexual assault has been bandied around so callously amongst the media. even by camilla's admissions she wasn't offended. |
|
|
| Fpcookie |
yeah feel sorry for john and ash. media has blown this up so much this is going to affect them for the rest of their lives.
im not trying to condone sexual assualt but what happened was clearly a joke gone too far between mates. it was stupid, yes but still feel sorry for them. |
|
|
| MiSSyM |
| quote: | "It was something that happened just in fun and I wasn't offended as such, but I did think they took it a little bit too far," she said on Big Brother last night.
"But we laughed it off and as soon as I said enough is enough it stopped, so I'm going to leave it up to Big Brother whether or not he wants to discuss it with the relevant housemates. |
THEY took it a little too far-you had no problem with it slut. Please if i was John or Ash id make Camilla suck it the slut, however i wouldnt even need to make her suck it, since she'd want to do it with her own free will! lol
| quote: |
Producers decided to evict Mr Cox and Mr Bric after consultation with the NSW Rape Crisis Centre and Sydney University Assoc Prof in Media Studies Catherine Lumby.
Ms Lumby said yesterday she told the producers the male housemates had crossed the line.
"There is a complete difference between sexual behaviour and sexual assault," she said. |
RAPE CENTRE?
MY GOD these people have blown it out of proportion!
Ive seen the video & this bitch KNEW THEY WERE GUNNA TURKEY SLAP HER!
SHE KNEW AND SHE LAUGHED & ALLOWED THEM TO DO SO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JH8e...related&search=
SHE SHOULDVE BEEN OUT OF THAT HOUSE FROM DAY 1.
:mad: :whip: :mad: |
|
|
| Paulie |
| I wouldnt blame camilla about it, she didnt want them to leave. Although both the blokes are suckers, and what they did was wrong, it didnt deserve getting kicked out of the house for... Ahh happens, show this year, just axe it already. |
|
|
| MiSSyM |
im not blaming her entirely, they were ALL involved, the guys are s for doing it.......but tbe fact remains she's still a ho!
:D |
|
|
| jizza |
| quote: | Originally posted by MiSSyM
im not blaming her entirely, they were ALL involved, the guys are s for doing it.......but tbe fact remains she's still a ho!
:D |
A HO FO' SHO' |
|
|
| Heidi_Fleiss |
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!
I don't give a what anyone says....
That dirty, rotted slut wanted it..She had ' ME' written on her forehead. She didn't have to lie between them, did she? Particularly when she KNEW they were going to do something sexually related?
Please. It's blatantly obvious it was with FULL, 'inconspicuous' consent...John's embrace was also VERY EASY to elude. The media is a good 'sensationalist' tool.
And did anyone notice directly AFTER the 'incident', she proceeded to give John a tug? DIRTY DIRTY DIRTY?
That filthy, rotten, cock-starved mole has a good ol fashioned GANG rape coming to her....
*spits*
Please excuse my outburst but I get REALLLLLLY angry when moles put themselves in 'sticky' situations, and when things BLOW, they wonder why..... |
|
|
| Paulie |
LMAO!!!!!
So much tension! |
|
|
| jizza |
| wtf talk about takin hate to another level. how is camilla to blame for the media's actions? |
|
|
| Heidi_Fleiss |
I'M NOT BLAMING CAMILLA.
I'm merely stating the obvious with regard to HER conduct, and how the incident was subsequently sensationalised by the media.
There are clearly no grey-area legalities here, therefore the boys should NOT have been ousted.
Irrespective of events, the fact still remains that Camilla is a MOLE. In other words, in this case, it took 3 to tango.. |
|
|
| jizza |
fair nuff. so in other, other words...
SHE WAS HURTIN' FOR A SQUIRTIN' |
|
|
|
|
