|
Consequences of a war in Iran? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Sunsnail |
30 feet below with reinforced concerete and ... wow.
If thats not safe... what is safe from bombings? (besides nukular) |
|
|
| Benshin |
Bunkerbuster bombs can go through that probably. I've seen a video of a bunkerbuster bomb go through 20 feet reinforced concrete. I saw that a couple years ago. I'm sure they have something better now.
If you guys didnt know, Israel has a lot of nukes.
Why can't Iran have a nuclear reactor. They just want to have lots of power like us. Pakistan have nukes. Why can't Iran? Pakistan has a lot of terrorist groups. I don't think any nukes were sold to them yet. |
|
|
| Lepanto |
Because Iran's regime is like a terrorist organization.
Bunkbusters will surely take care of this. |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| quote: | Originally posted by Benshin
Bunkerbuster bombs can go through that probably. I've seen a video of a bunkerbuster bomb go through 20 feet reinforced concrete. I saw that a couple years ago. I'm sure they have something better now.
If you guys didnt know, Israel has a lot of nukes.
Why can't Iran have a nuclear reactor. They just want to have lots of power like us. Pakistan have nukes. Why can't Iran? Pakistan has a lot of terrorist groups. I don't think any nukes were sold to them yet. |
I think a good argument against Iran having nukes is that the world should be trying to disarm itself of nuclear weapons. The USA and Russia etc. have been dismantling hundreds/thousands of nuclear weapons, and it would be counter-productive for another country to be able to build them. |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
America has no balls to do anything to Iran,because they know they'd be ed if they do and I LOVE IT. :gsmile:
GO IRAN GO |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
Because Iran's regime is like a terrorist organization.
|
so is the Bush administration. |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Benshin
Why can't Iran have a nuclear reactor. They just want to have lots of power like us. Pakistan have nukes. Why can't Iran? Pakistan has a lot of terrorist groups. I don't think any nukes were sold to them yet. |
double standards maybe?:whip: |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
Same with the nK's! |
yup,and if you notice you dont hear anything these days about NK anywhere anymore.Did they disarm or something?or is it because the U.S realized that again they cant do ?;) |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
I'd join your alliance... but... well my sig kinda denotes why it would be for the wrong reasons... :p |
Make me a sig of my alliance and join me :cool: |
|
|
| Lepanto |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
so is the Bush administration. |
:rolleyes: keep dreaming. |
|
|
| Dopey |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
i was watching a CNN report with a bunch of military annylists and i think it was Wolf Blitzer's program and he was asking them if a conventional air strike can penetrate Irans undergroud facilities, they are about 30 feet in the earth with concreted reinforcments and . they all said that it's completely possible.
|
actualy I believe the main bunker is estimated at 18-23 meters which is around 60-75 feet. the new bomb thats being field tested this summer "big blue" can destroy reinforced concrete bunkers at 60m or 200 feet. so no worries |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by Benshin
Why can't Iran have a nuclear reactor. They just want to have lots of power like us. |
I agree with that.
| quote: | | Pakistan have nukes. Why can't Iran? |
They signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. It states that they cannot use nuclear technology for weapons. I know that we haven't exactly kept our word, but they should at least keep theirs and use the nuclear technology given to them for peaceful (Energy) purposes only. |
|
|
|
|
