|
GU: 10 Years (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| tathi |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance Nutter
yay, cos I love listening to thngs with 20 songs an hour
You can really appreciate the music that way:rolleyes: |
better than 40 seconds of breakdown for every 1 minute of music :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Trance Nutter |
| quote: | Originally posted by tathi
better than 40 seconds of breakdown for every 1 minute of music :rolleyes: |
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand the obligatory trance bash.
This has nothing to do with trance.
It has everything to do with having too many tracks on each cd.
| quote: | Originally posted by Renegade
You've never seen a tech DJ before? |
this isn't tech;) |
|
|
| Aesthetic |
| Tathi - if you don't like the way trance songs are structured, eat a dick. |
|
|
| Renegade |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance Nutter
this isn't tech;) |
My point was that it's still possible to produce a good, musically viable mix without waiting until the last 8 bars to mix out of every track. Depending on how it's put together, sometimes more = more. ;) |
|
|
| sezzy |
| looks awesome. will keep an eye out for it |
|
|
| Trance Nutter |
| quote: | Originally posted by Renegade
My point was that it's still possible to produce a good, musically viable mix without waiting until the last 8 bars to mix out of every track. Depending on how it's put together, sometimes more = more. ;) |
but certain genres lend themselves to that style of mixing. Tech is one. I don't believe prog is, in my opinion you need to give it time to do its thing. I'm not advocating 7 minutes per track or anything, because you could get away with shorter stuff, but I don't think 3 minutes per track (shorter than a radio edit) is appropriate. |
|
|
| Renegade |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance Nutter
but certain genres lend themselves to that style of mixing. Tech is one. I don't believe prog is, in my opinion you need to give it time to do its thing. I'm not advocating 7 minutes per track or anything, because you could get away with shorter stuff, but I don't think 3 minutes per track (shorter than a radio edit) is appropriate. |
Well if you're talking about the atmospheric, "musical journey" type prog then I agree - the tracks need time to build and it's probably not going to work if you try to mix in or out of them half-way through - but based on the tracklists I don't think this is going to be that type of mix, especially not the first or third CDs. I could be wrong and the entire thing could end up sounding like a giant pile of , but with tracklists like those I think it'd take a musical genius like Tiesto to make them sound bad. |
|
|
| sezzy |
god always gotta be a bloody debate no matter what topic!
why can't you just say "hmmm that's great!" or "that's nice."
:p |
|
|
| Trance Nutter |
I'm not saying its gonna be bad. Cos as Renegade said with tracks like that not even I could make it sound bad.
I'm saying I think it could be better in an "enjoy the music" kind of way if they didn't try to cram so much in. |
|
|
| Philby |
| quote: | Originally posted by sezzy
god always gotta be a bloody debate no matter what topic!
why can't you just say "hmmm that's great!" or "that's nice."
:p |
because that would be boring :p |
|
|
| ONION |
Laurent Garnier - Man With The Red Face
Albion - Air
Planisphere - Deep Blue Dream
Lustral - Everytime (Nalin And Kane Remix)
Cass & Slide - Perception
some good tracks in there |
|
|
| sezzy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Philby
because that would be boring :p |
ah yes, very true. i can't talk anyway! just as bad as everyone else :D |
|
|
|
|
