|
Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11 (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Shibby
Thank you for this link... it was very interesting.
Nothing is ever as it seems. |
No worries. ;) |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
Because nobody is providing any sort of proof of anything. |
we've been providing evidence of plenty, and also asking a whole bunch of logical questions that must follow if youre a believer in the controlled demolition. for the most part, our questions go unanswered.
the conspiracy bollocks continues to plague us because:
| quote: | Originally posted by occrider
To be frank, there is no aggregate, defendable scientific explanation for 9/11 that conspiracy theorists have been able to stand behind. Their tactics consist of creating doubts about a million little things, the vast majority of which, if not all, fail, and thus we are supposed to subscribe to their grandeoise, unsubstantiated theory which would not last half a second of the very same level of scrutiny that they apply towards the "official" explanation |
|
|
|
| Zild |
| What other proof do I need than to read Rebuilding America's Defenses ? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
What other proof do I need than to read Rebuilding America's Defenses ? |
youre not serious are you? could you point to any particular paragraph in that document that has anything to do with 9/11? and if youre gonna quote that pearl harbour reference then i pity you. |
|
|
| DJ Shibby |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
What other proof do I need than to read Rebuilding America's Defenses ? |
Recovering alcoholic? :haha: |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
[QUOTE]Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
^^ the figures ive seen are 550 mph. [/QUOTEso according to the theory of relativity the planes hit the buildings at 550mphs. HMMM wouldn't that not be enough force to knock a building down? So, the theory that there might have been some bombs in the building don't sould so far fetched..... |
ok there einstein. beyond the fact taht the theory of relativity is not even remotly applicable.... how bout this little theory
its called impulse and momentum Force = Mass x Velocity.
this law explains why a fully loaded oil tanker traveling at 2 mph will do more dammage to a fixed object than a car travelling at 120 mph
so lets convert to metric. since that is the language of engineering
550 mph =~ 245.87 m/s
average fully loaded 727 has a mass of aprox 95 tons or 95 000 Kg
so 245.87 m/s x 95000 Kg = 23.4 MEGA NEWTONS. which is a piss load of force
if i can refute your measly arguments with basic arithmatic and simple newtonian physics. just wait until i get really pissed off and model all this in SAP 2000 |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| if you keep doing this colonel im gonna have to ask you to marry me :D |
|
|
| Swamper |
| The only question I still have to this day is how the Pentagon plane was kept so low off of the ground. To impact such a low building at such a high speed means it must have started a gradual descent a long ways off aka some pretty slick flying. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by Swamper
The only question I still have to this day is how the Pentagon plane was kept so low off of the ground. To impact such a low building at such a high speed means it must have started a gradual descent a long ways off aka some pretty slick flying. |
while im no aerospace engineer, i do know thtat those planes are designed to be able to perform far more extreem manoevers than we see in day to day flights. at the propper distance the plane could have pulled a steep dive and leveled out at a low altitude.
its a possiblitiy. unfourtunatly there is not video proof of the planes approach
ps Shaolin_z theresa says your a goober |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by Swamper
The only question I still have to this day is how the Pentagon plane was kept so low off of the ground. To impact such a low building at such a high speed means it must have started a gradual descent a long ways off aka some pretty slick flying. |
Not to mention it was incredibly convenient that they hit the part of the pentagon that had no one in it because it was under construction. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Not to mention it was incredibly convenient that they hit the part of the pentagon that had no one in it because it was under construction. |
come back to the right side of the force theresa.............
anger leads to fear, fear leads to agression, agression leads to suffering. |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
come back to the right side of the force theresa............. |
They're sucking me in!!!!
No but seriously... that seems slightly fishy to me. |
|
|
|
|
