|
Bpm (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DOOMBOT |
| quote: | Originally posted by KilldaDJ
yeah maybe. but i bet u that track is more driving at 145bpm than +0% |
I don't think so. A lot of times it is hard to keep the track sounding good once you go beyond a certain -+%. I have a bunch that still sound fine but I also have a ton that sound like utter once you go beyond about 3% to 5%
Just remember, faster isn't always better. ;) |
|
|
| KilldaDJ |
| quote: | Originally posted by DOOMBOT
I don't think so. A lot of times it is hard to keep the track sounding good once you go beyond a certain -+%. I have a bunch that still sound fine but I also have a ton that sound like utter once you go beyond about 3% to 5%
Just remember, faster isn't always better. ;) |
that i can agree on, i do have a couple of tracks which are like 148bpm, so a subtle -2% or something gets it to that sweet spot
but then again tempo plays a role in deciding what key the track is in, detuning it and such. |
|
|
| TOR |
| quote: | Originally posted by KilldaDJ
yeah maybe. but i bet u that track is more driving at 145bpm than +0% |
Are you specifically talking about trance here?
Because I can't picture a funky house track being driving @ 145 bpm. |
|
|
| humilis |
| Groove is below 130BPM |
|
|
|
|
