|
Guy Builds Stonehenge
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Trazedict |
....without any machinery.
This is really fascinating, and ingenius as well.
link here |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| interesting. nice find. |
|
|
| Clinkz913 |
| quote: | Originally posted by tubularbills
interesting. nice find. |
c0r news worthy. |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| quote: | Originally posted by Clinkz913
c0r news worthy. |
nah....if someone from the c0r had done it....thne.....oh yes, then it would be news worthy |
|
|
| Masonious |
| so how do you get the rocks to lie across the top of the two pillars? :conf: |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Masonious
so how do you get the rocks to lie across the top of the two pillars? :conf: |
i thought about that, but im shure if he can do that , there has to be a way with rope or something. |
|
|
| babyvsrhino |
| my guess is the technique he used to get it to 3 ft but kept going. |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by babyvsrhino
my guess is the technique he used to get it to 3 ft but kept going. |
or that :o |
|
|
| Masonious |
| i can see getting the horizontal stone piece high enough, i'm not quite sure how they could move something with such mass on top of the other two pieces. if he can show me how to do that with such simple methods i'll be impressed. :o |
|
|
| Enigmatic XTC |
| probably with the rolling method |
|
|
| mezzir |
| quote: | Originally posted by Masonious
i can see getting the horizontal stone piece high enough, i'm not quite sure how they could move something with such mass on top of the other two pieces. if he can show me how to do that with such simple methods i'll be impressed. :o |
i think i got it kinda worked out
imagine the 3ft method got him to like 12 or w/e, and its eventually going to be about 9 ft up. you then, with that standing there and supports to keep it from shifting or falling standing perpindicular to it, you then place the two upright vertical beams. after those are in place, they should be 3ft lower than the cross beam, so there's a 3ft gap between the vertical stones and the crossbeam
then i'm not sure if technically you could reverse the 3ft method
i feel like it might be more difficult, but doable
if not than then burn the pieces holding the horizontal crossbeam in place, and eventually it should fall down in place
i just dunno if doing it that way it'd fall evenly or just real quick and fall over
idk |
|
|
|
|
