|
Paul Oakenfold - Not Over
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DJ Legs |
| Heard this on Sirius, Awsome track IMHO. Better than the Original from Grace. Anyone Fimiliar with the track? I bet it sounds awsome in the club. |
|
|
| montana |
| it's horrible & redudant. Oakenfold butchers His & Steve Osbourne (heavy emphasis on osbourne)'s classic. |
|
|
| DJ Legs |
| Are you talking about the track itself? There are 2 Mixes from Oakenfold that I know of... And of course, Thats your Opinion. I happen to really enjoy the track. |
|
|
| montana |
Grace = Paul Oakenfold, Steve Osbourne & Dominique Atkins
Osbourne & Oakenfold produced the original Not Over Yet in 1993 with Dominique Atkins on vocals
1995 came BT Mixes
1999 came the Breeder Mixes (and also some remixes by Anthony Acid & DJ Skribble)
2006 came Oakenfold's Remake. it's horrible, it's redudant. and it's just yet another sign thtat oakenfold is just a washed up, out-of-ideas, talantless monkey |
|
|
| Sykonee |
| Sounds like something Anjunabeats would churn out. |
|
|
| DJ Legs |
| Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song? |
|
|
| montana |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Legs
Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song? |
you must be joking |
|
|
| JakeC |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Legs
Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song? |
He tried to better CJ Bolland - The Prophet on his last album. I loled. |
|
|
| SMC |
| I like the new vocals and the new lyrics, the melodies and the production aren't that exciting, so overall it's a decent tune i would say. |
|
|
| waxHead |
"Paul Oakenfold - Not Over" ?
More like "Paul Oakenfold - DEFINITELY Over" :stongue:
He should take his money and retire quietly, rather than embarrass himself with pathetic mixing and awful remixes of classic tunes. |
|
|
| SkooB_E |
| I don't think those two songs should even be compared. This is so different from the old one it's a totally new song. |
|
|
| miamitranceman |
| quote: | Originally posted by SkooB_E
I don't think those two songs should even be compared. This is so different from the old one it's a totally new song. |
I agree. Although I do like the updated version. |
|
|
|
|
