|
America: From Freedom to Fascism (MUST SEE)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| shaolin_Z |
By Aaron Russo:
Google Video Link: [[ LINK REMOVED ]]
http://www.freedomtofascism.com/
This has got to be one of the most important documentaries to come out and every American should watch it. Occ & Shakka, you guys will definetly like this. |
|
|
| Lilith |
I was going too post this up last week but wasnt sure it was a repost.
First half of it is a bit boring, informative but a little long winded but Russo goes too a fair amount of effort too make sure its as well explained as he can. This one unlike a lot of Mike Moore films is something of a genuine documentary as much as that comes out of US cinema these days in that at least he tried too keep a bit of bias out of it and at least goes looking for the other side of the arguments point of view to try and present theirs. Not very much from them, which is suprising really as he's a well known figure in the entertainment industry so you'd think they'd have more too say.
Sometimes saying not very much is worse and I'm not sure if its his editing or just the simple fact that they dont respect him, or the government really just doesnt want too comment on it for some really dangerous reasons.
Unlike Mike Moore films which I lump generally into 'light entertainment' and political satire, or things like the 9-11 conspiracy movie which is floating around I just couldnt take very seriously at all. This is something which people in the US probably should take very seriously as should some other people in the world being the US is very influential in their daily lives in many direct and indirect ways.
The second half is a lot more hard hitting and managed too wake me up from the snooze I was starting too fall into after listening too income tax over and over :)
Perhaps it isnt as specific as the first half but he's thrown together a lot of things compellingly, so you'll watch it and he does present a pretty good argument there for what he sees as happening even if like me youre not quite sure what too make of it. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| There is a valid concern about the long-term well-being of certain American freedoms. However, rehashing those tired tax protester arguments greatly detracts from one's credibility. |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
However, rehashing those tired tax protester arguments greatly detracts from one's credibility. |
Huh? How so? |
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Huh? How so? |
b/c it's rather a petty argument IMO.
Arbiter might think differentlyt |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
Arbiter might think differentlyt |
Abiter's thinking=God
He isn't egotistical to say it out front. But he is egotistical to say he is unique among the rest of the populace and he won't give any backing as to why that is:( |
|
|
| venomX |
| The more information i see abt this american government, the more i go from active dislike of america as a nation to pity. i wonder when americans will grow their balls back and use all that bravado they like to flaunt around all the time to actually get their government to work for them. from glorious nation, to pathetic pawn, herein lies the future of america if you, the citizens of america, dont step up your game. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Huh? How so? |
Because it represents a basic failure to understand what law really is.
| quote: | Why do you always assume that the courts are right and the tax protesters are wrong? Couldn't the courts be wrong about what the Constitution means?
Basically, the process of law is a process of consensus. We have a variety of procedures, some political, some judicial, and some bureaucratic, for determining what the law should be and how it should be applied. If we don't like the results, we have ways of changing the results, and when there are conflicts, we have ways of resolving conflicts. However, when the courts, the legislatures, and the voters all agree on what the law is, that is what the law is. The fact that some people believe that the law should be different means that they are free to argue their positions within the political system and attempt to change the results.
In the case of the income tax, there is no conflict. The judicial branch, executive branch, and legislative branches of our government, and a majority of the voters, all agree that (1) an income tax is constitutional, (2) it applies to wages, (3) every citizen and resident of every state is required to file a tax return and pay the tax. That is what the law is. There is no question about it.
When lawyers talk about what "the law" is, they are talking about how a judge will rule. Not how the judge should rule, or might rule, but will rule. Measured by that standard, this FAQ states what "the law" is, because a judge will rule against the tax protester arguments described above 100% of the time. Not 95% of the time, or even 99.999% of the time. 100.00%. |
http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html |
|
|
| venomX |
by the definition you yourself quoted it would not be a law anyways because judges have not ruled "100%" of the time in that manner, so your argument still doesn't apply :conf: |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by venomX
by the definition you yourself quoted it would not be a law anyways because judges have not ruled "100%" of the time in that manner, so your argument still doesn't apply :conf: |
Yes, they have ruled that way 100% of the time. |
|
|
| venomX |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
Yes, they have ruled that way 100% of the time. |
Are you serious, in that video alone theres about 10 examples, including supreme court rulings where the courts have ruled against the income tax. Im pretty sure that if searched, one could probably dig up a ton more examples. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by venomX
Are you serious, in that video alone theres about 10 examples, including supreme court rulings where the courts have ruled against the income tax. Im pretty sure that if searched, one could probably dig up a ton more examples. |
There are a variety of issues that have gone to court related to income tax which have been ruled on in various ways, but no court has ever ruled that:
1. Income tax is unconstitutional,
2. income tax doesn't apply to wages, or
3. you don't have to file a tax return and pay that tax.
Many of this cases, such as the ones in that video, have been misappropriated by tax protestors in an attempt to use them to show something beyond what the ruling actually states. However, this does not lend their arguments any more strength. |
|
|
|
|
