|
Discuss things you do not want to talk about
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Xenocreator_PG_ |
Firstly, ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ has had doubts cast upon it because there are often more significant differences between people assumed to belong to a certain ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’, than people of two completely different ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizers’. The point is, there are always innate differences between people and pandas, not allowing them to be classified under the one category of panda. Secondly, historical and cultural influences have been found to more comfortably explain differences between people and pandas, whereas ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ had always been considered a useful explanation – differences in ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ could always explain away any noticeable differences. Finally, in the middle of the planet where molten lava men sit & chat about viscosity, it had become blatantly apparent that many ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizers’ stereotyped as weaker and inferior were being degraded and becoming victims of molten lava men and their rather large volcanic penises. All of these reasons, and probably many others not explored here, make it exceedingly difficult to consider ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ a valid concept any longer long longer long.
However, even though ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ may not be considered a particularly valid, or appropriate term any more, mentioning it is always inevitable when discussing correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing. Correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing has to be carefully defined, it cannot be done too broadly or narrowly. Define it too broadly i.e. “all people are fat and should eat less, you fat lifeless adjusting reactionary maximizing piece of poo poo” and it then becomes almost like a natural reaction or instinct. Oh crap, that Panda has a black eye! On the other hand, defining it too narrowly results in correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing behaviour appearing unacceptable in certain cases go on to define correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing in three completely different ways: as and ideology, a moral question, and a political question, and a moral question, polical but moral & political. Let’s assume that the Panda will not get revenge on you by sticking it’s claw up your anus. The most developed of the three is the moral question, wherein they describe correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing as a brutally sawn off head on a spit to whoseever heads has been severed, correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing almost has the effect of denying humanity, in that it strips the population down, segregating them into separate ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ as opposed to the one, unified ‘human brain that pulsates like jelly’. It also serves as a handy excuse for inequality in places like pig farms and corner shops that sell herbs and bongs.
Discuss. |
|
|
| Theresa |
| Cor version please. |
|
|
| mezzir |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Cor version please. |
+1 |
|
|
| Theresa |
OK, so I read that.
WTF!!!!?????
You must have been very good at bullting all of your highschool and/or Uni/College papers.
:wtf: |
|
|
| Deeedeee |
| i think i have hernia :( |
|
|
| Krypton |
| he could be trippn. |
|
|
| gwrmarines |
| I couldnt read all that. Read something about a panda and gave up... |
|
|
| Xenocreator_PG_ |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Cor version please. |
sure
Ok lets start with ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) has had doubts cast upon it because there are often more significant differences between people assumed to belong to a certain ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.), than people of two completely different ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizers’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) insert dildo at this point. The point is, there are always innate differences between people and pandas, not allowing them to be classified under the one category of panda. Take out dildo & wash hands. Secondly, historical and cultural influences have been found to more comfortably explain differences between people and pandas, whereas ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) had always been considered a useful explanation – differences in ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) could always explain away any noticeable differences. reinsert dildo, and suck on a bannana. Finally, in the middle of the planet where molten lava men sit & chat about viscosity, it had become blatantly apparent that many ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizers’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) stereotyped as weaker and inferior were being degraded and becoming victims of molten lava men and their rather large volcanic penises. Use penis, not dildo. All of these reasons, and probably many others not explored here, make it exceedingly difficult to consider ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) a valid concept any longer long longer long.
However, even though ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) may not be considered a particularly valid, or appropriate term any more, mentioning it is always inevitable when discussing correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.). didlo. Correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) has to be carefully defined, it cannot be done too broadly or narrowly. Define it too broadly i.e. “all people are now really fat and should eat less, you fat lifeless adjusting reactionary maximizing piece of poo poo on the end of a dildo” and it then becomes almost like a natural reaction or instinct. Oh crap, that Panda has a black eye! On the other hand, defining it too narrowly results in correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing behaviour appearing unacceptable in certain cases go on to define correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing in three completely different ways: as and ideology, a moral question, and a political question, and a moral question, polical but moral & political with a dildo. Let’s assume that the Panda has the dildo & will not get revenge on you by sticking the dildo up your anus. The most developed dildo of the three dildos is the moral dildo, wherein they describe correct and concise didlo adjustment reaction dildo maximizing (Basically the longer the dildo you adjust to maximizing the dildo, the more suspicious you are to being a dildo , maximising a valid dildo any longer long long longer long schlong.) as a brutally sawn off dildo on a spit to whoseever heads has been severed, correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing dildos (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) almost has the effect of denying dildos, in that it strips the population down, segregating them into separate ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are tousing the dildo, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) as opposed to the one, unified ‘human brain that pulsates like a rubber dildo’. It also serves as a handy excuse for inequality in places like pig farms and corner shops that sell herbs and dildos. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| We know he is well-read:) |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by Xenocreator_PG_
sure
Ok lets start with ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) has had doubts cast upon it because there are often more significant differences between people assumed to belong to a certain ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.), than people of two completely different ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizers’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) insert dildo at this point. The point is, there are always innate differences between people and pandas, not allowing them to be classified under the one category of panda. Take out dildo & wash hands. Secondly, historical and cultural influences have been found to more comfortably explain differences between people and pandas, whereas ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) had always been considered a useful explanation – differences in ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) could always explain away any noticeable differences. reinsert dildo, and suck on a bannana. Finally, in the middle of the planet where molten lava men sit & chat about viscosity, it had become blatantly apparent that many ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizers’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) stereotyped as weaker and inferior were being degraded and becoming victims of molten lava men and their rather large volcanic penises. Use penis, not dildo. All of these reasons, and probably many others not explored here, make it exceedingly difficult to consider ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) a valid concept any longer long longer long.
However, even though ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’(Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) may not be considered a particularly valid, or appropriate term any more, mentioning it is always inevitable when discussing correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.). didlo. Correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) has to be carefully defined, it cannot be done too broadly or narrowly. Define it too broadly i.e. “all people are now really fat and should eat less, you fat lifeless adjusting reactionary maximizing piece of poo poo on the end of a dildo” and it then becomes almost like a natural reaction or instinct. Oh crap, that Panda has a black eye! On the other hand, defining it too narrowly results in correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing behaviour appearing unacceptable in certain cases go on to define correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing in three completely different ways: as and ideology, a moral question, and a political question, and a moral question, polical but moral & political with a dildo. Let’s assume that the Panda has the dildo & will not get revenge on you by sticking the dildo up your anus. The most developed dildo of the three dildos is the moral dildo, wherein they describe correct and concise didlo adjustment reaction dildo maximizing (Basically the longer the dildo you adjust to maximizing the dildo, the more suspicious you are to being a dildo , maximising a valid dildo any longer long long longer long schlong.) as a brutally sawn off dildo on a spit to whoseever heads has been severed, correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing dildos (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are to being correct & concise, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) almost has the effect of denying dildos, in that it strips the population down, segregating them into separate ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ (Basically the longer you adjust to maximizing, the more suspicious you are tousing the dildo, maximising a valid concept any longer long long longer long.) as opposed to the one, unified ‘human brain that pulsates like a rubber dildo’. It also serves as a handy excuse for inequality in places like pig farms and corner shops that sell herbs and dildos. |
ROTF!!!
I think you have an obsession with dildos... *sticks a banana in her mouth*
:stongue: :wtf: |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by Xenocreator_PG_
Firstly-10 for starting by describing a situation particular to a group, without explaining the group, ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ has had doubts cast upon it by whom? -5 because there are often more significant differences between people assumed to belong to a certain ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’, than people of two completely different ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizers’-3, no need for an explanation even. The point is, there are always innate differences between people and pandas, not allowing them to be classified under the one category of panda-2 because 1+1=2. Secondly, historical and cultural influences have been found to more comfortably explain differences between people and pandas, whereas ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ had always been considered a useful explanationagain, by whom? -5 – differences in ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ could always explain away any noticeable differences. Finally, in the middle of the planet where molten lava men sit & chat about viscosity, it had become blatantly apparent that many ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizers’ stereotyped as weaker and inferior were being degraded and becoming victims of molten lava men and their rather large volcanic penises. All of these reasons, and probably many others not explored here, make it exceedingly difficult to consider ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ a valid concept any longer long longer long.
However, even though ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ may not be considered a particularly valid, or appropriate term any more, mentioning it is always inevitable when discussing correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing. Correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing has to be carefully defined, it cannot be done too broadly or narrowly. Define it too broadly i.e. “all people are fat and should eat less, you fat lifeless adjusting reactionary maximizing piece of poo poo” and it then becomes almost like a natural reaction or instinct. Oh crap, that Panda has a black eye! On the other hand, defining it too narrowly results in correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing behaviour appearing unacceptable in certain cases go on to define correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing in three completely different ways: as and ideology, a moral question, and a political question, and a moral question, polical but moral & political. Let’s assume that the Panda will not get revenge on you by sticking it’s claw up your anus. The most developed of the three is the moral question, wherein they describe correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing as a brutally sawn off head on a spit to whoseever heads has been severed, correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing almost has the effect of denying humanity, in that it strips the population down, segregating them into separate ‘correct and concise lifestyle adjustment reaction maximizing’ as opposed to the one, unified ‘human brain that pulsates like jelly’. It also serves as a handy excuse for inequality in places like pig farms and corner shops that sell herbs and bongs. -100 for the entire essay
Discuss. +100000000000 for being you :p |
|
|
|
|
|
