Dr. Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, is professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. He served as chief economist for the United States Department of Labor during 2001--2002, George W. Bush's first term. In 2005, he gained public attention as the first prominent government official to publicly claim that 9/11 was an "inside job," and is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. This interview footage was recorded in June 2006 at the Chicago 9/11 Truth conference.
Q5echo
well i guess thats it then:rolleyes:
my god Z, wtf?
that was the lamest rambling garbage i've yet heard on this subject.
i wonder what happened at that debate?
LazFX
Can't watch til I get home.
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by LazFX
Can't watch til I get home.
yeah, hurry up. it 's a real gem this one.
LazFX
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
yeah, hurry up. it 's a real gem this one.
ha ha
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
yeah, hurry up. it 's a real gem this one.
:stongue: :stongue:
my connection is slow today so im still waiting for the vid to load, but i did a bit of searching and this guy is repeating all the same rubbish the really crazy crazies are fond of repeating. check this out
quote:
The engineering establishment’s theory has further difficulties. It is well-known that the hole in the west wing of the Pentagon, less than 18-foot diameter, was too small to accommodate a Boeing 757, but the North Tower’s hole wasn’t big enough for a Boeing 767 either, the alleged widebody airliner used on AA Flight 11 (officially tail number N334AA, FAA-listed as "destroyed"). A Boeing 767 has a wingspan of 155’ 1" (47.6 m) yet the maximum distance across the hole in the North Tower was about 115 feet (35 m), a hole undersized by some 40 feet or 26 percent.
and then theres these
quote:
1. Fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three buildings on 9/11, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9/11.
2. The fires, especially in the South Tower and WTC-7, were small.
3. WTC-7 was unharmed by an airplane and had only minor fires on the seventh and twelfth floors of this 47-story steel building yet it collapsed in less than 10 seconds.
4. WTC-5 and WTC-6 had raging fires but did not collapse despite much thinner steel beams (pp. 68–9).
5. In a PBS documentary, Larry Silverstein, the WTC lease-holder, recalled talking to the fire department commander on 9/11 about WTC-7 and said, "…maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it," slang for demolish it.
6. FEMA, given the uninviting task of explaining the collapse of Building 7 with mention of demolition verboten admitted that the best it could come up with had "only a low probability of occurrence."
7. It’s difficult if not impossible for hydrocarbon fires like those fed by jet fuel (kerosene) to raise the temperature of steel close to melting.
same stuff that has been shot down time and time again.
and ill add the next sentence that appears on wiki (where shaolin's brief bio of dr reynolds seems to originate) that isn't included here.
quote:
A number of researchers questioning the official account of 9/11 have expressed concern over Reynold's theory that commercial jets were not involved in the WTC attacks.
now, dont get me wrong im really going to watch this vid when it has loaded, but the guy sounds like a pretty "out there" kinda guy.
Lilith
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
now, dont get me wrong im really going to watch this vid when it has loaded, but the guy sounds like a pretty "out there" kinda guy.
Some of the 911 doco's are full of some pretty 'out there' people and the rest are full of other people who rabbit on about physics, chemistry, explosives and engineering which I just can't pick through with any kind of educated opinion. I'm even less likely to absorb it through a medium like a TV documentary because a lot of these things tend to have their 'bias' so, calling it a documentary is fairly generous.
That and I'm feeling kind of mentally exhausted today so I really don't want to sit through another hour or so of people belting around the issue and until I see one of the 'docos' presented by a non-american, neutral party, it'll just be one of those 'mysteries of the deep' things that happened.
Purple
Their is hell lot of similarities between Bush and current administration and Hitler and his administration..
1)Both used 'dirty' politic to win, I mean real dirty.. like threating people who opposed them or speak the truth.. they both won not because people chose them, but because these two people snubbed the voice of people who opposed them.. if you watch Farenhite 9/11 first 15 mins will tell you how Bush did it. Bush had eggs on his Limo during the very 1st day at office, during the predential victory rally..
2)Both run secret prisons and try to convince people that its necessary.. one was to save Germany from Jews, todays its to save US from Muslims..
3)Both has introduced Bill in parliament asking for basic civil rights to be stripped of.. like entering a house, searching, tapping any phone, arresting anyone anytime..
4)I had lot more, is slipping from my mind but will post as soon as I recall..
Looking at above similarities, between Hitler and Bush, I cannot rule 9/11 is not an inside job.. remember Hitler burned his own party office and headquaters to stay in office.. he sent his own men to burn the very important historical monument in Germany so that he can stay/come back in power... this is the same thing Bush did. This is the fifth point.
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
well i guess thats it then:rolleyes:
my god Z, wtf?
that was the lamest rambling garbage i've yet heard on this subject.
i wonder what happened at that debate?
[redundant] Not that I agree with your views on 9/11 [/redundant], but I can see why you'd say that now. I'll admit I didn't watch it before posting it (since the soundcards for the Lab terminals on campus don't work). Apparently it didn't exactly turn out to be what I expected eigther. Still kind of unexpected to hear that from someone who served the administration though.
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by Purple
Their is hell lot of similarities between Bush and current administration and Hitler and his administration..
1)Both used 'dirty' politic to win, I mean real dirty.. like threating people who opposed them or speak the truth.. they both won not because people chose them, but because these two people snubbed the voice of people who opposed them.. if you watch Farenhite 9/11 first 15 mins will tell you how Bush did it. Bush had eggs on his Limo during the very 1st day at office, during the predential victory rally..
2)Both run secret prisons and try to convince people that its necessary.. one was to save Germany from Jews, todays its to save US from Muslims..
3)Both has introduced Bill in parliament asking for basic civil rights to be stripped of.. like entering a house, searching, tapping any phone, arresting anyone anytime..
4)I had lot more, is slipping from my mind but will post as soon as I recall..
Looking at above similarities, between Hitler and Bush, I cannot rule 9/11 is not an inside job.. remember Hitler burned his own party office and headquaters to stay in office.. he sent his own men to burn the very important historical monument in Germany so that he can stay/come back in power... this is the same thing Bush did. This is the fifth point.
wow, i'm at a real loss for words here. this is a truly mind-boggling and fascinating allegory
the depth of insight is astonishing. it's almost like hearing Beethoven for the first time, only reading it on my computer screen
i'm almost convinced "Purple" is a front of Lindsay Lohan. if only i could see Purple's .
Groundhog Boy
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
[redundant] Not that I agree with your views on 9/11 [/redundant], but I can see why you'd say that now. I'll admit I didn't watch it before posting it (since the soundcards for the Lab terminals on campus don't work). Apparently it didn't exactly turn out to be what I expected eigther. Still kind of unexpected to hear that from someone who served the administration though.
Do you really think that a chief economist in the Department of Labor is someone who's that high up that he'd actually know anything? If he knows "the truth," shouldn't there be hundreds of others who would be more privy to classified info than he is, and thus should know as well?
quote:
Originally posted by Purple
Their is hell lot of similarities between Bush and current administration and Hitler and his administration..
1)Both used 'dirty' politic to win, I mean real dirty.. like threating people who opposed them or speak the truth.. they both won not because people chose them, but because these two people snubbed the voice of people who opposed them.. if you watch Farenhite 9/11 first 15 mins will tell you how Bush did it. Bush had eggs on his Limo during the very 1st day at office, during the predential victory rally..
2)Both run secret prisons and try to convince people that its necessary.. one was to save Germany from Jews, todays its to save US from Muslims..
3)Both has introduced Bill in parliament asking for basic civil rights to be stripped of.. like entering a house, searching, tapping any phone, arresting anyone anytime..
4)I had lot more, is slipping from my mind but will post as soon as I recall..
Looking at above similarities, between Hitler and Bush, I cannot rule 9/11 is not an inside job.. remember Hitler burned his own party office and headquaters to stay in office.. he sent his own men to burn the very important historical monument in Germany so that he can stay/come back in power... this is the same thing Bush did. This is the fifth point.
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
Purple, you are a walking advertisement for abortion. Why don't you take a hike son?
Quoted again for emphasis. Your participation is a great disservice to any argument you're trying to push.
