|
Breaking News: enferno BANNED! (pg. 17)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| jonSun |
Wow the cor was boring all day & then i go to work & come home & the hits the fan. :p
Well i dont get why Enferno was banned for this. I guess 10 thread showing the same celebrity pics or videos of guys chopping off thier balls is ok, but a thread labeled NSFW then a pic of a beer & is bannation. ed up.
FFS last month a TA mod posted a video of a girl getting triple teamed by 3 guys dressed up as big bird & that was ok. It showed hardcore penetration & everything. :wtf: ed up video too, totally made me say WTF outloud. :p |
|
|
| Xenocreator_PG_ |
| ENFERNOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooo.............!!!!!! |
|
|
| idoru |
| I'm on the fence as to whether or not he should've been banned for this. However, I do think that he shouldn't have been let back in from his previous ban for various reasons pertaining to that issue (including what he posted, and blatant lies/poor excuses he had told mods that the mods ended up buying due to their bias, which mods aren't supposed to have, towards another member). |
|
|
| Xenocreator_PG_ |
| quote: | Originally posted by idoru
I'm on the fence as to whether or not he should've been banned for this. However, I do think that he shouldn't have been let back in from his previous ban, for various reasons pertaining to that issue (including what he posted, and blatant lies/poor excuses he had told mods that the mods ended up buying due to their bias, which mods aren't supposed to have, towards another member). |
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo...........!!!!! |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| we have let way worse people stay around on these forums, and frankly a pint in a doesnt seem that bad to me..... unless it was full of sam adams, then its just in gross |
|
|
| Ian |
| I'd like to actually hear a mods take on this. Who did it and why. Perhaps there's stuff we don't know, perhaps there isn't. Leaving it like this is only going to end up causing more confusion & ultimately more problems. With this stuff & the fact accounts don't need to be approved now, no wonder we're confused. |
|
|
| Ivand |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ian
I'd like to actually hear a mods take on this. Who did it and why. Perhaps there's stuff we don't know, perhaps there isn't. Leaving it like this is only going to end up causing more confusion & ultimately more problems. With this stuff & the fact accounts don't need to be approved now, no wonder we're confused. |
+1
Still, if it were just for the beer/ picture, there are some very ed up double standards here |
|
|
| Ian |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ivand
+1
Still, if it were just for the beer/ picture, there are some very ed up double standards here |
exactly, and if it's for something we don't even know about, at least it could kill the rumours. |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
The beer pictured is a near-beer (0.5%). That right there is ban-worthy! |
|
|
| mellow_head |
The mods have absolutely no control over this forum. Especially when there's no one around during the day (I mean day here in CET), so technically at night :p another thread going to waste.
*whistles, shuts door and turns on X-Files episode* |
|
|
| Ivand |
| quote: | Originally posted by mellow_head
The mods have absolutely no control over this forum. Especially when there's no one around during the day (I mean day here in CET), so technically at night :p another thread going to waste.
*whistles, shuts door and turns on X-Files episode* |
actually the mods are just biased |
|
|
| mellow_head |
| I don't know what that means 'biased':rolleyes: |
|
|
|
|
