|
hussein hanged!! whats your thoughts? (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DevilDogUSMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
it's hard to believe this guy keeps ShaolinZ up all night quivering in his race car bed. |
LOL, I can just see the parade of smilies he'd use
:eyespop: :crazy: :nervous: :eyes: :rolleyes: :mad: :( :eek: :confused: |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
it's hard to believe this guy keeps ShaolinZ up all night quivering in his race car bed. |
Does your comment that make you feel better about having a 1 inch cock? |
|
|
| Lilith |
| Oh good greif, lay off each other or go play in the COR if you really need to start sledging each other too make yourselves feel big. |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lilith
Oh good greif, lay off each other or go play in the COR if you really need to start sledging each other too make yourselves feel big. |
I think Q5 is the only one that has a needs to "feel big." I only responded to asinine comment out of annoyance.
@ Q5: Consider getting a penis enlargment and then advertising it too, because you're never going to get laid otherwise. Your personality complete to begin with and you obviously use tweezers to masturbate, I dont' see you having a chance otherwise. |
|
|
| Q5echo |
BOO:stongue: |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
LOL :D. Ok, you have a sense of humour, even though it wasn't funny the first time around.
EDIT: , you had to post that at like 11 pm didn't you Q lol. |
|
|
| LazFX |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lilith
Oh good greif, lay off each other or go play in the COR if you really need to start sledging each other too make yourselves feel big. |
Yeah you two!! And also, GET OFF HER LAWN!!!! ha ha ha :D |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
its good to see shaolin start 2007 off with some really nice craziness :p
the military industrial complex? are you saying you believe there are american military companies that somehow control events & a government's foreign policy to such a degree as to actually be able to generate wars?
you also think the PNAC document has plans for 9/11 clearly laid out :p |
I don't understand the usage of the ":p" smiley when you're going to be insulting me, my intelligence, and putting words in my mouth. Is that supposed to make it cute or something :conf:? |
|
|
| Lilith |
| No ones going anywhere near my lawn or I'll set the dog on you! :nervous: |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by Renegade
I oppose the death penalty as a general rule and I'm not about to make an exception in this case. Ghandi once said that a measure of a civilization is how well it treats its animals, but I think the same judgement can be made with regards to its treatment of criminals: no civilised population on the planet supports the murder of defenceless human beings. The belief that barbarism is a justifiable reaction to barbarism betrays a visceral, tribalistic morality, that has gradually been supplanted in the civilised world with the advent of reason. A population that suports capital punishment still has a lot of progress to make, in my opinion. I can sympathise with the desire of many Iraqis to see Saddam Hussein hanged, but that doesn't make it right. The execution of criminals is, was and always will be wrong, cultural relativism be damned.
You can only receive the death sentence once, no matter how many crimes you've committed.
Also because the ICC doesn't support the death penalty. Genocidal political leaders (from the Nazis onward) have always been tried by international tribunals, so I'm not sure why an exception was made in the case of Saddam Hussein. In fact, I'm not even sure what crime he was charged with: was genocide illegal in Iraq when he was in power?
The trial was a farce. He was denied access to his lawyers, who were in turn denied access to the evidence being presented by the prosecution. The trial proceded even when no member of the defence team was present and there were constant questions about the legitimacy of the court and the US trained judges. It's one thing to mete out the death penalty, it's quite another to mete out the death penalty at the end of a shonky trial.
Yes, because if there's one thing sure to take Iraq forward it's more death and reprisal. |
I certainly respect your opinion there Renegade and agree with you on the trial being unfair to say the least, but I must disagree with your stance on capital punishment. It's only fair that a murdered be "murdered" in return. Revenge or anything like that has nothing to do with it. The moment someone takes a life, unjustifiably, is the moment he/she gives up his/her right to live IMO. I fail to see how that's barbaric. But yes, it isn't exactly pleasant to see. |
|
|
| Purple |
| quote: | Originally posted by TheDemon
pls elaborate on this, as I do not see what he posted to be stupid. |
ok I will explain by giving an example, it should be clear afterwards how that thing I quoted was actually stupid.
A person 'Z' is in jail. He has two cases pending against him:
Case 1: Rape and Murder of 13 year old girl. Penalty: Death
Case 2: Shoplifting, caught stealing a candy on surveilance camera. Peanlty: 2 months and 20 Iraqi Dinar fine.
Person 'Z' was found guilty in Case 1 and sentenced to death by hanging.
So what he said is that: How can the person Z be hanged when he still hasnt been proved guilty in stealing candy case?
Here:
| quote: | Originally posted by Ian
The thing that confuses me is that he's still on trial for other crimes, so how can he be hanged before that's concluded? |
|
|
|
| Purple |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
he still would have been put to death or "murdered" eventually. the only difference being time.
what logical difference does it make to you? or is logic even involved with your above opinion? seriously, b/c in my opinion your logic is clouded by hate. |
No it would have been hell lot different than just the timing of his death. A totally different case if this trial was held in Hague..
Saddam has been punished for faliures of US in Iraq. He has been punished for current Civil War in Iraq.
This death sentence was absurd and unjustified, a cold blooded murder by the occupying forces of the enemy country's leader. He was a great leader and whole world has protested this hanging.
This is what would have most probably happened if the trial was held in Hague IMO:
Saddam being sentenced to 30-50 years in prison, which would have ensured that he dies in prison. But after spending 10 years when he gets too old and sick, he would have been granted pardon and sent in exile to some other Saudi nation where he would have died in peace if not dignity. |
|
|
|
|
