|
Navigating through music production programs
|
View this Thread in Original format
| SmoothOperator |
Hey, as a beginner in musical production through software, I have compiled basic beats and synths through Fruity Loops. Although there is still much to learn, I have gotten down the bare basics of the mixer, programming plugin synths (Z3ta/imposcar as of now).
Of course I am aware many artists migrate to more intricate programs after mastering one, I was wondering what the best route is for me to take next. I would like to be very progressive in learning the programs like ableton/cubase etc, and I am pondering whether this is a good option for me, or if I should stick it out on Fruity Loops until I have down everything.
I am eager to learn, but not sure what to use, any opinions? |
|
|
| Eldritch |
Stick to FL until you've completed a handful of good tracks.
Then you can think about switching.
Switching now will be pointless both from from a learning perspective and financially.
This is just my opinion though. |
|
|
| LoopyFIN |
Every DAW mentioned in these forums is good enough to create decent tracks. It's not about the software, it's about the producer.
You obviously know your way in Fruity Loops already, why not stick with it then? Learning a new DAW takes always some time.
Stick with what you already got. Switching DAW's everytime new version is released (or just for fun of it) isn't cheap. |
|
|
| SMC |
| Stick to FL, it does what all other DAWs do, and imo it's way more pleasant to work with. |
|
|
| nec |
| I wonder why people always want to switch from FL? Because Cubase sounds more serious? |
|
|
| SmoothOperator |
thanks for the replies.
Basically, what I am concerned with is Fruity Loops technical capabilities. I know I can compile and create with FL, but what I am unclear about is the capabilities that I can reach with it. Overall I just wanted some insight from more seasoned musical producers and I think I got my answer, thanks. |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by SmoothOperator
thanks for the replies.
Basically, what I am concerned with is Fruity Loops technical capabilities. I know I can compile and create with FL, but what I am unclear about is the capabilities that I can reach with it. Overall I just wanted some insight from more seasoned musical producers and I think I got my answer, thanks. |
It has as much capabilities as you do. Every program does more or less the same thing, it's up to you to make it good. |
|
|
| DigiNut |
Some of the more expensive sequencers have better-optimized workflows for more complex and esoteric operations. There are many other differences but this is neither the time nor the place to be discussing them (there are countless other threads covering that tired old debate).
The bottom line is that it would be pointless for you to switch unless you actually feel like you're being limited by your tool(s) - it's very unlikely at this point that you'll need the more "advanced" capabilities of the other sequencers. Some people never feel limited and if you end up being one of them, there's no point in wasting tons of money on a different product. |
|
|
| Fledz |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Some of the more expensive sequencers have better-optimized workflows for more complex and esoteric operations. There are many other differences but this is neither the time nor the place to be discussing them (there are countless other threads covering that tired old debate).
The bottom line is that it would be pointless for you to switch unless you actually feel like you're being limited by your tool(s) - it's very unlikely at this point that you'll need the more "advanced" capabilities of the other sequencers. Some people never feel limited and if you end up being one of them, there's no point in wasting tons of money on a different product. |
Well said 
Nothing wrong with any of the popular sequencers. They are all capable of making great music. It's only once you figure out how you like to work and develop a personal preference that you may want to switch. Try the demos first. |
|
|
|
|
