return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 
Iran possibly 2 years from bomb (pg. 3)
View this Thread in Original format
Dopey
quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Israel wont do all,after their so called success in Lebenon I doubt they ll be stupid enough to pull another one like that.


dropping one bomb is a lot easier than going after rocket happy idiots in the hills

I don't think Israel will care what anyone thinks, they will be too scared of not doing it to care.
Fir3start3r
quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
First of all there is no proof of them making any weapons,and even if they are,it would be more for self protection,they ae not gonna go bomb the region. :rolleyes:

I didn't suggest that they were actually building anything; you just did though.

quote:

why are you ok with Israel,Pakistan,India having nukes?you feel like they are safe and will never use it?


The fact that they do and haven't doesn't suggest anything to you?
They are not what I would call, politically responsible enough given their record in dealing and abiding with the rest of the modern world.
pmoisse
quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
The fact that they do and haven't doesn't suggest anything to you?
They are not what I would call, politically responsible enough given their record in dealing and abiding with the rest of the modern world.


Again, this argument doesn't hold much water for me since only one country has ever used these damned weapons.

Every country (except the US) who has them can proudly proclaim that they've never used them. The US can say that they never used them through the whole cold war, even though things got pretty close on a number of occasions.

But hey, this looks like the way that human kind is headed anyways, so why not get a bigger stick with which to defend yourself? It will be our ultimate undoing. It's just a matter of time.
Magnetonium


And thats not all, folks. United States, Britain, France also used nuclear (uranium) based weapons, depleted uranium - very toxic, deadly in high doses isotope of uranium, heavily used by NATO and Americans in bombings of Serbia, Desert Storm.

Wikipedia quotes on depleted uranium

"Depleted uranium (DU) is uranium that has a reduced proportion of the isotope Uranium-235. It is mostly made up of Uranium-238. The names Q-metal, depletalloy, and D-38, which once applied to depleted uranium, have fallen into disuse.

Its high density has made it a valued component in some technical applications, specifically in military projectiles. Such uses remain controversial, as U-238, besides its residual radioactivity, is known from several laboratory studies to be toxic to mammals, especially to the reproductive system and fetus development, causing reduced fertility, miscarriages and fetus malformations."

"In the 1970s, The Pentagon reported that the Soviet military had developed armor plating for Warsaw Pact tanks that NATO ammunition couldn't penetrate. The Pentagon began searching for material to make denser bullets. After testing various metals, ordnance researchers settled on depleted uranium. DU was useful in ammunition not only because of its unique physical properties and effectiveness, but also because it was cheap and readily available. Tungsten, the only other candidate, had to be sourced from China. With DU stockpiles estimated to be more than 500,000 tons, the financial burden of housing this amount of low-level radioactive waste was very apparent. It was therefore more economical to use depleted uranium rather than storing it. Thus, from the late 1970s, the U.S., the Soviet Union, Britain and France, began converting their stockpiles of depleted uranium into kinetic energy penetrators.

Photographic evidence of destroyed equipment suggests that DU was first used during the 1973 Arab-Israeli war. Various written reports cite information that was obtained as a consequence of that use.[1]

However, while clearing the decades-old Hawaii Stryker firing range, workers have found chemical weapons from World War I era and depleted uranium ammunition from the 1960s [3].

The U.S. military used DU shells in the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 Iraq War

Polluted with radiation areas of Iraq:



Fir3start3r
quote:
Originally posted by pmoisse
Every country (except the US) who has them can proudly proclaim that they've never used them. The US can say that they never used them through the whole cold war, even though things got pretty close on a number of occasions.


And that's the whole point.

Can we honestly say, given Iran's current world defiance, that they would do the same if they were in a state of crisis?
They certainly haven't given anyone any reason to trust them, and why should we unless they straighten up and work with the rest of us.
Cyrus King
quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
And that's the whole point.

Can we honestly say, given Iran's current world defiance, that they would do the same if they were in a state of crisis?
They certainly haven't given anyone any reason to trust them, and why should we unless they straighten up and work with the rest of us.


YOU CANT TRUST ANY GOVERNMENT!!

this is a joke.. you are isolating Iran becuase we cant "trust" them????

Trust them to beckon to the demnads of people who manufacture the very weapon they fear IRan having??

Do you "TRUST" the CHINESE government?
Purple
quote:
Originally posted by Zild
Why can't they have nukes for the same reason other countries have nukes? Deterrence.


Because they are a Muslim nation.
metalgearsolid
quote:
Originally posted by Purple
Because they are a Muslim nation.
Pakistan is a muslim nation and their people, just as much as the rest of the middle east, hates Americans. Iran can't have a nuke because the leaders eat babies for breakfast and for lunch enjoy the splendor of cutting open a homosexual and staying in awe of someone genetically different being.:rolleyes:

But really the only reason why the debate is up; is too excuse the American foreign policy.
Purple
quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Pakistan is a muslim nation and their people, just as much as the rest of the middle east, hates Americans. Iran can't have a nuke because the leaders eat babies for breakfast and for lunch enjoy the splendor of cutting open a homosexual and staying in awe of someone genetically different being.:rolleyes:

But really the only reason why the debate is up; is too excuse the American foreign policy.


Hey common Pakistan and India went nuclear at the same time, but what Pakistan got was sanctions and what India got after some time was cooperation from US and USSR in sharing nuclear technology.
christos
awesome...I wonder what they'll do with it?:rolleyes:

ScreaminFish
quote:
Originally posted by christos
awesome...I wonder what they'll do with it?:rolleyes:



Can't wait for their pres to go on tv and say

"Our words are backed by NUCLEAR WEAPONS!"

should be civ 1 but civ2 works just as well i guess
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by ScreaminFish
Can't wait for their pres to go on tv and say

"Our words are backed by NUCLEAR WEAPONS!"

should be civ 1 but civ2 works just as well i guess


What's with all the troll spammig lately?

CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 
Privacy Statement