|
Just so everyone knows.... (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Nostrum |
| quote: | Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
Actually it doesn't.
This is your "poll question":
I was chatting with a friend from TAUK. He said that TA's that had Gender confusing..
These are your "poll answer options":
Gender confusing = Gay/Les
Gender confusing = Strait
Gender confusing = Closet
Gender confusing = Sexually Ambiguous
Doesn't really make sense to me...especially since there is no question posed. What I take it to mean (only assuming b/c of the answers you have as an option), is that you're asing us what we think the definition of "gender confusing" is...not what we think about so called "gender confusing avatars".
So no, I'm not really over thinking it - I'm basically reading what your poll is.... |
Yes I realize that. But I have never done a poll before. If you look it is almost the same as my initial post just below it. They only give you like 40 characters or something and not realizing that my post would be included I was stuck with that. I also didn't know that I couldn't go back and tweak it as only moderators can do that. I'm sorry. All you have toi do is read my post just below it and you will realize that it is the full version of the question....Everybody else did.
| quote: | Dunno Just so everyone knows....
....I was chatting with a friend of mine from TAUK and had mentioned that members that have "Gender" confusing Avatars are in fact gay/les. Something about "Their secret handshake" so to speak. I told him he was crazy but he insisted enough to make me wonder. So have at it. And if he is crazy, why all of the gender confusing Avatars?
|
|
|
|
| Cosmic Fur |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nostrum
All you have toi do is read my post just below it and you will realize that it is the full version of the question....Everybody else did. |
Actually, with 17 votes and 541 views, I'm not sure that's true. |
|
|
| Nostrum |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
This one I actually figured out. He's being sarcastic because everyone jumped on him when he quoted stuff from an unrelated thread in that other thread where he made a jackass of himself by quoting things from an unrelated thread. |
Not sure if I would say jack ass. I was illustrating a point of principal. The context was irrelevant. That was the point. The reason for that remark here, your very close, was because while I was being flammed for my quoting, others were introducing quotes from all over the forum to do so. Double standard???? |
|
|
| Nostrum |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
Actually, with 17 votes and 541 views, I'm not sure that's true. |
That's not the reason for the weak results. It's likely because most don't know what "Ambiguous" means.
Edit: The purpose of this poll has more then served it's self for me. If there had been 4 voters I would have been happy. The rest is gravy. However, I didn't expect, that with that many views, so few would have the balls, like jennypie, to actually vote. |
|
|
| Cosmic Fur |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nostrum
That's not the reason for the weak results. It's likely because most don't know what "Ambiguous" means. |
We should put "nostrum's posts" in the definition of it. |
|
|
| Cosmic Fur |
| To be honest, I didn't vote cause there was one option missing - "Gender confusing = doesn't mean jack ". I would have voted for that one. |
|
|
| Nostrum |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
To be honest, I didn't vote cause there was one option missing - "Gender confusing = doesn't mean jack ". I would have voted for that one. |
Actually, your right. I did need a control but as I said I have not done one before and there was a point of no return. Believe it or not, I thought at the time to ask your opinion in the matter. But as many things in life, you just have to operate within the scope of the task at hand. If you try to change the scope, you have missed the point all together. Besides giving peeps a cop out option wouldn't have been as interesting.
I say the the # of peeps that didn't vote = the # of peeps that would have picket the "Gender confusing = doesn't mean jack " option.
PS: How do you like my Bash-kit? LOL I had to!!!
LOL- How do you like them apples!!! hahaha |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nostrum
Edit: The purpose of this poll has more then served it's self for me. If there had been 4 voters I would have been happy. The rest is gravy. However, I didn't expect, that with that many views, so few would have the balls, like jennypie, to actually vote. |
Your first language isn't English, is it? You really need to learn how to use a comma properly.
And I DID vote. Unless you're commenting on my big hairy King Kong balls, in which case yes, my balls are huger than everyone else's. |
|
|
| Cosmic Fur |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Your first language isn't English, is it? You really need to learn how to use a comma properly.
And I DID vote. Unless you're commenting on my big hairy King Kong balls, in which case yes, my balls are huger than everyone else's. |
Jenny, i'm looking forward the day we meet so I get to play with your big balls. |
|
|
| Nostrum |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
We should put "nostrum's posts" in the definition of it. |
C'mon, you know better then that. You can't use 'the word' in the definition description of 'that word'. No a picture on the other hand. You could use my bash-kit |
|
|
| Cosmic Fur |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nostrum
C'mon, you know better then that. You can't use 'the word' in the definition description of 'that word'. |
If Simpsons can do it, so can I. |
|
|
| neuromancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nostrum
That's not the reason for the weak results. It's likely because most don't know what "Ambiguous" means. |
ambiguous is a very ambiguous term. |
|
|
|
|
