|
How many climaxes in one track?
|
View this Thread in Original format
| oDrori |
Been puzzled about this for a while now...
How many climaxes or "Peaks" should one track have?
We make no seperations between vocal and instrumental tracks which will toughen your choice... |
|
|
| DJ Teknique |
| 2 sounds good.....3 is too much |
|
|
| D_G |
Id say one... Why should a track come round again with the lead if its allready done it? It has nothing else to offer the second time around and becomes boring
One big, major @$$ kissing climax is all thats needed;)
[Dan] |
|
|
| oDrori |
I go with 2, I found lots of m,ore psycholopgical explenations for why coming with 1 but for some reason 2 still fit me more....
3 Is there mostly for vocal tracks with the typical
House>(Bridge?)>Chorus>House>(Bridge?)> "C" House> Chorus |
|
|
| ascension |
2 for sure...
but the second one has to be greater than the first for sure...
tilt - i dream
second peak = bliss :) |
|
|
| DJ Fundamental |
| Two. Shane 54 - Equinoxe 4 is a perfect example of how it should be done. 1st one should hold something back for the second one... |
|
|
| Podroom |
| One big Mother..... |
|
|
| IronDragon |
| 2 is just right. 3 in only the rarest of rare cases. But, as always, the track should sound good, regardless of the number of breakdowns/buildups, whatever |
|
|
| biznology |
| 2 is usually good, but they cant both be equal, it has be building or breaking down. salmon/ |
|
|
| M.A.R.K |
| actually hard to say. i think i prefer 1 massive buildup over 2 but it varies from track to track. having the buildup come again later in the track can make it boring FAST. |
|
|
| skattrd |
| One major peak for me and a few little ones during the build up, mmmmm nice .... |
|
|
|
|
