|
Iran upset over movie "300" (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| LazFX |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
LOL, do I look black or bisexual ? :D |
:D
too easy...... ;) |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by LazFX
:D
too easy...... ;) |
LOL, you're a dick Laz :D ;) ! |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| What you guys don't understand is that many dumbass rednecks will take the representation of persian in this movie somewhat seriously, because, yes, they're that dense. And so will other racist pricks. And the subtle undertones, and more blatant ones, do helps shape ignorant people's opinion as they have no other frame of reference. I have no idea what the Iranian reaction to the movie is, but it's definetly prowar/antiIrani progapanda for racists and rednecks, which would happen to be the majority of the country. Trust me, you have no idea how many times I've been called sand****** in a "liberal" town like Austin, even assaulted. Most of you probably won't be phased by it, since such ridiculous BS propaganda I believe really is in the eye of the beholder, but it will reinforce racist sentiments for a lot of people most of you don't know and don't associate with. Don't forget the dumbass support base that "elected" this administration in again. So it's not as ridiculous as you think, eventhough it is LOL. And spartans fighting under the banner of "freedom," LOL, give me a break. Most of you guys don't know much about history do you. LOL, and what's with this bull element in the movie about "supporting the troops?" Come on now, don't be so naive. No, I'm not saying the movie is SUPPOSED TO BE a historical record, before you silly geese say something absurd about any implications in my post lol. But it's highly exagerated and biased in it's presentation. And I find that a little hard to believe as being a genuine adaptation as Frank Miller's work since I've read his stuff before, which it bears no similiarity too. |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| ^yeah, you know I thought the Spartans were totalitarian and the Persians were a lot more democratic than the Spartans. It's the truth you know? |
|
|
| M.Johan |
| Persians are our brothers |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
^yeah, you know I thought the Spartans were totalitarian and the Persians were a lot more democratic than the Spartans. It's the truth you know? |
Stop being a dick head. I never said the Persians weren't emperialists expanding their empire. They just weren't anything like portrayed in the movie. Now stop sucking on that Spartan dick MGS. |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Stop being a dick head. I never said the Persians weren't emperialists expanding their empire. They just weren't anything like portrayed in the movie. Now stop sucking on that Spartan dick MGS. |
No, you head it is the truth. Cyrus, ruler of all of Persia, was basically one of the first leaders to have let so many people rule thier own way. In the Persian empire, he allowed for cities to be self governed. He was not an evil totalitarian. |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
No, you head it is the truth. Cyrus, ruler of all of Persia, was basically one of the first leaders to have let so many people rule thier own way. In the Persian empire, he allowed for cities to be self governed. He was not an evil totalitarian. |
LOL, and what empire isn't totalitarian in nature? I don't remember saying it wasn't. |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
LOL, and what empire isn't totalitarian in nature? I don't remember saying it wasn't. |
No, what I meant is that the Persian empire at least let the people keep their own customs and language. They just had to pay taxes to Cyrus. And fight in their wars. That was a lot more liberal than your spartans. |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| Hehe, ok. Looks like I misunderstood you there. I thought you were being sarcastic :D. |
|
|
| LazFX |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
LOL, you're a dick Laz :D ;) ! |
he he he :D
Well I ran across this one and if you need some cash to get to NYC to slap this guy since you are a decendent from a noble line as well..
I am surprised no one has called this guy out:
| quote: |
Meet 21-year-old New York socialite Andrew Embiricos, grandson of Rita Hayworth, direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad and amateur gay porn star. Sometimes headlines just write themselves
--------------------
Andrew Embiricos, 21, is a junior New York socialite. He is the son of Princess Yasmin Aga Khan, a grandson of Rita Hayworth, and nephew of the current Aga Khan.
By tradition of the Aga Khan blood line, he is a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad. Also, he is an amateur gay porn star, uploading videos to the Internet with names like "Chelsea Bareback Whores."
The trail isn't hard to pick up. As of yesterday, the main image on Embiricos' MySpace profile was of him holding a hand-written sign saying: "March 26, 2007 XTube screenname: Andrew Sauston."
Look up Andrew Sauston on XTube.com - an adult version of YouTube.com - and you will find Embiricos starring in three homemade erotic videos.
In "Chelsea Bareback Whores" he is enjoying unsafe sex. "Tossin' Sauston" has arresting visuals, plus a creative disco remix of Whitney Houston 's famous "crack is whack" interview.
At least Embiricos is living up to a family tradition. The Aga Khans are billionaire hereditary leaders of an Islamic sect, and his grandfather was the first man in its 1,300-year-history to be passed over for the title owing to his playboy ways.
|
SOURCE |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| What a f'n disgrace. Then again, he is an Aga Khani so somehow it doesn't come as such a surprise. |
|
|
|
|
