|
Study shows abstinence only program does absolutely nothing except cost $176M a year
|
View this Thread in Original format
| occrider |
Confirming what everyone, except the seriously brain-dead, already knew. Given the propensity for the Bush administration to stick with failed strategies however, expect them to waste another another couple hundred million of our tax dollars on it.
| quote: |
Abstinence students still having sex
Study tracked 2,057 young people in government-funded programs
Updated: 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Students who participated in sexual abstinence programs were just as likely to have sex a few years later as those who did not, according to a long-awaited study mandated by Congress.
Also, those who attended one of the four abstinence classes reviewed reported having similar numbers of sexual partners as those who did not attend the classes, and they first had sex at about the same age as their control group counterparts — 14 years and nine months, according to Mathematica Policy Research Inc.
The federal government now spends about $176 million annually on abstinence-until-marriage education. Critics have repeatedly said they don’t believe the programs are working, and the study will give them reinforcement.
However, Bush administration officials cautioned against drawing sweeping conclusions from the study. They said the four programs reviewed — among several hundred across the nation — were some of the very first established after Congress overhauled the nation’s welfare laws in 1996.
Not like vaccines
Officials said one lesson they learned from the study is that the abstinence message should be reinforced in subsequent years to truly affect behavior.
“This report confirms that these interventions are not like vaccines. You can’t expect one dose in middle school, or a small dose, to be protective all throughout the youth’s high school career,” said Harry Wilson, the commissioner of the Family and Youth Services Bureau at the Administration for Children and Families.
For its study, Mathematica looked at students in four abstinence programs around the country as well as students from the same communities who did not participate in the abstinence programs. The 2,057 youths came from big cities — Miami and Milwaukee — as well as rural communities — Powhatan, Va., and Clarksdale, Miss.
The students who participated in abstinence education did so for one to three years. Their average age was 11 to 12 when they entered the programs back in 1999.
Mathematic then did a follow up survey in late 2005 and early 2006. By that time, the average age for participants was about 16.5. Mathematica found that about half of the abstinence students and about half from the control group reported that they remained abstinent.
“I really do think it’s a two-part story. First, there is no evidence that the programs increased the rate of sexual abstinence,” said Chris Trenholm, a senior researcher at Mathematica who oversaw the study. “However, the second part of the story that I think is equally important is that we find no evidence that the programs increased the rate of unprotected sex.”
Trenholm said his second point of emphasis was important because some critics of abstinence programs have contended that they lead to less frequent use of condoms.
Mathematica’s study could have serious implications as Congress considers renewing this summer the block grant program for abstinence education known as Title V. The federal government has authorized up to $50 million annually for the program. Participating states then provide $3 for every $4 they get from the federal government. Eight states decline to take part in the grant program.
Some lawmakers and advocacy groups believe the federal government should use that money for comprehensive sex education, which would include abstinence as a piece of the curriculum.
“Members of Congress need to listen to what the evidence tells us,” said William Smith, vice president for public policy at the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, which promotes comprehensive sex education.
“This report should give a clear signal to members of Congress that the program should be changed to support programs that work, or it should end when it expires at the end of June,” Smith said.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18093769/?from=rss
|
|
|
|
| HardTranceProd |
| i was just about to post this :D thank u |
|
|
| MisterOpus1 |
The abstinence-only fiasco doesn't just end within our own borders. Here's Wolfowitz explaining that there have been no changes in the World Bank's policies in reproductive health and family planning:
| quote: | “Let me make it very clear. Our policy hasn’t changed. … It is a development issue. The policy of this institution I think was very clear before I got here and it will remain very clear.”
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=37336 |
Which as you would guess by now is utter bull:
http://www.whistleblower.org/conten...fm?press_id=893
Speaking of abstinence, it really probably woulda helped Wolfowitz himself if he woulda practiced that policy himself. Seems he's about to get his ass fired by the World Bank directors for showing a slight bit of favoritism to his little girlfriend:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?...GpKg&refer=home
Nice job there, Paul. Dumbass. |
|
|
| MrSquirrel |
Wolfowitz can now become the war czar for the president!
Seeing as no retired generals are willing to do it because of the influence of the Cheney people on military policy.
Of course, the whole idea of a "war czar" screams of a president admitting he is not capable of carrying out his constitutional duties as commander in chief. It also deserves its own thread probably heh.
Abstinence only programs don't work, my 9th grade health teacher who was a huge proponent of abstinence promotion said in sex ed that "while I do not support this personally as I feel abstinence is the only sure-fire solution to the pregnancy/STD problem, if you decide to have sex, here is what is available to help lower your risks." and he then went on to explain the concepts of 'raincoats' and 'the pill'.
MrS |
|
|
|
|
