|
Xone 62 and DJM-400
|
View this Thread in Original format
| cassa.de.x |
Question for those who've recorded mixes on both a 62 and a DJM-8/400:
I own a DJM-400 but wanted something with a few more channels. I know the 62 is years-old in comparison, but will I be taking a hit in sound fidelity when I record mixes? |
|
|
| EvilTree |
| In terms of sound quality, xone > pioneer |
|
|
| idoru |
| quote: | Originally posted by EvilTree
In terms of sound quality, xone > pioneer |
End of thread, really. |
|
|
| cassa.de.x |
| quote: | Originally posted by idoru
End of thread, really. |
In the words of Bill Paxton as Pvt. Hudson,
"Game over, man! Game over." |
|
|
| Allen Mueller |
| You wont be taking a hit you'll be upgrading in sound quality. |
|
|
| miamitranceman |
| Unless you are using digital cables into CDJs from the 400. Then you have the digital/analog debate. |
|
|
| nutsan |
| quote: | Originally posted by miamitranceman
Unless you are using digital cables into CDJs from the 400. Then you have the digital/analog debate. |
the djm400 doesn't have digital connections |
|
|
| miamitranceman |
| quote: | Originally posted by nutsan
the djm400 doesn't have digital connections |
Oops yeah, meant the 800. |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| It depends what kind of music you want to play. If you're going for a proggy-house sound than go with the 62. If you wanna fool around with FXs and play trance go with the 400. :D |
|
|
|
|
