return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
NOOB here, is it koshur to use a 180bpm tune on a 144bpm set? (pg. 2)
View this Thread in Original format
Dojomaster26
quote:
Originally posted by alefort
What does a 180 BPM record even sound like? I can't say I have ever come across any... ???


The entire Drum & Bass genre?

I wouldn't stray too far past 4% myself. Even with Master Tempo things get kind of shaky in the sound, and the crowd will notice the difference...
Orbital32
I saw richie hawkin at Space one time (the one in miami) and he was using Serato. That thing was crazy! It was going about a million BPM but it sounded dope mixed in with another track.
DJChrisB
quote:
Originally posted by blinky13
180bpm


Jesus Christ that's fast. Be careful, your head might explode.
sEpH
Speedcore = 400++ bpm

THATS fast
JD8180
quote:
Originally posted by sEpH
Speedcore = 400++ bpm

THATS fast


can you even hear the beats at 400+ bpm? or is it just so fast that it sounds all washed in together :crazy:
Stu Cox
quote:
Originally posted by JD8180
can you even hear the beats at 400+ bpm? or is it just so fast that it sounds all washed in together :crazy:

You can hear them, but you probably don't want to!

The thing is, as music gets faster the fractions of beats get less frequently used... a lot of hardcore (around 180bpm ish) rarely uses semiquavers, everything is either on the beat or off beat (i.e. in quavers).

Speedcore rarely has any sounds even off beat. So you could argue that every time you lose a level of rhythmical complexity, the track could actually be classed as being half the tempo with kicks occuring twice as often, i.e. a 400bpm tune is actually a 100bpm tune with a kick on every semiquaver ;)
xtr3m
quote:
Originally posted by Trance Nutter
Latvia was in February last year, this happened at the august meeting, jeez keep up:toothless


Damn, they keep changing the rules! I'm tired of having to adjust every time!
Fledz
You mean actually keeping it at that tempo or slowing it down?

I can't see how it would sound good to be honest...
Nemesis44
Simple rule, you can use what ever you like as long as it connects with the people you are playing to and it works. If it sounds good do it.

Occasionally you do get tracks that sound pretty crap at the speed they are writen at but come to life at a different speed altogether. Can't remember one off hand but there are a few.

Just so you know, be careful if you take my advice as I am considered a renegade by the World DJing council and there is currently a price on my head. Decided in the Molvanian meeting... ;)

Cheers
Nem
BOOsTER
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
You mean actually keeping it at that tempo or slowing it down?

I can't see how it would sound good to be honest...


you can match on every second...or every fourth beat

let's say an example on a normal track

you have this hiphop tune which is at 65bpm...
and you wanna mix this house tune at 130bpm into it...

65 * 2 = 130...so if you match on every second beat it will sound matched...


the same thing works with the speedcore tracks...if they are your current bpm *2 or *4 etc you can match that :-)

Fledz
No I wasn't talking about the mixing. I was talking more about slowing that tune down so much that it just didn't fit.

Sure with Ableton and the functions on a CDJ you can reduce the tempo without affecting the pitch much, but it will still sound out of place.

Then again, who knows. A certain track might sound decent.
BOOsTER
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
No I wasn't talking about the mixing. I was talking more about slowing that tune down so much that it just didn't fit.

Sure with Ableton and the functions on a CDJ you can reduce the tempo without affecting the pitch much, but it will still sound out of place.

Then again, who knows. A certain track might sound decent.


in the example I showed you you wouldn't touch the pitch at all...just count....


you could match a 400bpm track with a 100bpm track without touching the pitch...
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
Privacy Statement