|
American Jihadists and Al Qaida liberals, what is going on?
|
View this Thread in Original format
| erdega |
as if one needed a reminder who created and financed al qaida and many radical islamic movements around the globe, in comes tom lantos, a democrat senator and a notorious helper of radical islam, I assume as long as it doesn't involve Israel . On a personal note, he is the biggest anti serbian propagandist in the US senate so he says this to his cause of dismembering Serbia and a so called "independent kosovo" run by albanian islamic terrorists
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julia...-t_b_46424.html
| quote: | "Just a reminder to the predominantly Muslim-led government[s] in this world that here is yet another example that the United States leads the way for the creation of a predominantly Muslim country in the very heart of Europe. This should be noted by both responsible leaders of Islamic governments, such as Indonesia, and also for jihadists of all color and hue. The United States' principles are universal, and in this instance, the United States stands foursquare for the creation of an overwhelmingly Muslim country in the very heart of Europe." (emphasis added)
|
It's interesting that liberals in US and Europe are still the biggest supporters of radical islam as well as western imperialism that attempts to use those radical islamic groups for their concquests and causes. I guess this started in Afghanistan in the 80's when cia and others armed mujadadeen and saw their fanaticism and devotion as an advantage and a tool to be used in the future. This would explain explosive growth of AQ and their off shoots while at the same time allow western concquest . US and EU have also made a litany of "laws" to protect muslims as a "race" no less and made it criminal to offend them in any way which is very easy to do nowadays.
Most people in the west however are led to believe that US and their euro allies are fighting al qaida which is a supposedly "twisted" version of islam . However most people in the west are ignorant or willfully ignorant of differences and rivalries in the "islamic world" . This makes it easier for them to target Iraq and Iran and other places while leaving AQ to operate as it wants as they don't really hold land or government nonwithstanding that large populations of Iraq and Iraq are/were secular or non islamic.
Speaking of AQ, here is tha latest from Ayman Al Zawahiri . He claims that al qaida is basically more than islam and "urges" blacks , latinos and other "oppressed" people to join their struggle instead of enlisting in US army. This is familiar but twisted speach and reads like any liberal mouthpiece in Washington or Brussels
http://www.siteinstitute.org/bin/ar...s&Subcategory=0
| quote: | “That’s why I want blacks in America, people of color, American Indians, Hispanics, and all the weak and oppressed in North and South America, in Africa and Asia, and all over the world, to know that when we wage Jihad in Allah’s path, we aren’t waging Jihad to lift oppression from the Muslims only, we are waging Jihad to lift oppression from all of mankind, because Allah has ordered us never to accept oppression, whatever it may be.”
|
The whole interview can be seen here
http://clearinghouse.infovlad.net/s...hlight=zawahiri
So we are seeing a role reversal that was really evident for all to see for a while . Western powers led by neocons and their liberal globalist enablers will use any catch phrase including adopting islamic causes of expansion and any excuse to attack anyone, anywhere and anytime knowing that mainstream media will make their targets seem genuine, likewise serbs were nazis, Saddam is/was Osama , Iran is nazi holocaust state etc... With enough repetition it becomes a fact of sorts to inflame the masses and proclaim a sort of pyrhic "victory"
On the other hand AQ is "branching out" so to speak, not only globally but in their rhetoric and agenda. They were "just islamic" but it's clear that they are looking for global allies with their outreach to "oppressed people" . I think this is what must have been like in 1930's when nazis and commies were professing higher goals but were quiet willing to compromise on those goals in order to occupy strategic lands and build an empire for themselves. This could all be solved if people like Lantos and Zawahiri decided on a debate over who has done more for islam , democracy and oppressed people but that's not going to happen as both would be exposd to everyone. Instead we are all at the mercy of these crazy old men |
|
|
|
|