|
For multipolar world systems
|
View this Thread in Original format
| M.Johan |
First i'm sorry for my English
Now USA is considered to be the
Unipolar system after the end of the cold war
,it has the mighty power for making a global regime and domination
by its huge various militaral,economical,scientifical and
advanced educational abilties.
the same as the old British Empire in the past
Now America by its huge mass media it invades the world through its
media networks and manufacturing global arts like Hollywood.
my question depends on the following:
That there're now many regiones like Russia,China,Malaysia,...etc
have the willing for the establishment of a balanced global multipolar systems
they have enough abilities imo for facing the bad effects of the American Globalism
these bad effects like the invasion on the other regional cultures identities and arts.
so
Can America accept that the unipolar system is the worest system in dealing with world crisises
and at the same time accept a balanced world with a multipolar regional systems?? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
throughout history cultures grow and die. why is the american cultural imperialism a bad thing? it is merely competing for the hearts and minds of the world's population. if people want to watch seinfeld on their satellite TVs, drink coke and play computer games, who is to say they can't? why would a "multipolar regional system" (whatever that means) be any better?
people arent forced into accepting cultural imperialism, it is an inherently democratic procedure. amercia wouldn't be dominating particular areas of culture if other societies had equally appealing aspects to their own cultures in which to revel and export and influence the rest of the world with.
the perception that cultures a priori deserve preservation goes against the history of social evolution. cultures should be dynamic and responsive to change, not to maintain antiquated belief systems or structures which can be counter-productive to social advacement.
as soon as another society produces something like star wars, battlestar galactica, supreme commander (PC) or gridiron, im more than happy to jump ship. until then, i'll keep enjoying the (good) popular culture that is shipped out from the good ol US of A :) |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
throughout history cultures grow and die. why is the american cultural imperialism a bad thing? it is merely competing for the hearts and minds of the world's population. if people want to watch seinfeld on their satellite TVs, drink coke and play computer games, who is to say they can't? why would a "multipolar regional system" (whatever that means) be any better?
people arent forced into accepting cultural imperialism, it is an inherently democratic procedure. amercia wouldn't be dominating particular areas of culture if other societies had equally appealing aspects to their own cultures in which to revel and export and influence the rest of the world with.
the perception that cultures a priori deserve preservation goes against the history of social evolution. cultures should be dynamic and responsive to change, not to maintain antiquated belief systems or structures which can be counter-productive to social advacement.
as soon as another society produces something like star wars, battlestar galactica, supreme commander (PC) or gridiron, im more than happy to jump ship. until then, i'll keep enjoying the (good) popular culture that is shipped out from the good ol US of A :) |
yep yep!
But then you get wackos saying our media is designed to brainwash the world. |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
throughout history cultures grow and die. why is the american cultural imperialism a bad thing? it is merely competing for the hearts and minds of the world's population. if people want to watch seinfeld on their satellite TVs, drink coke and play computer games, who is to say they can't? why would a "multipolar regional system" (whatever that means) be any better?
people arent forced into accepting cultural imperialism, it is an inherently democratic procedure. amercia wouldn't be dominating particular areas of culture if other societies had equally appealing aspects to their own cultures in which to revel and export and influence the rest of the world with.
the perception that cultures a priori deserve preservation goes against the history of social evolution. cultures should be dynamic and responsive to change, not to maintain antiquated belief systems or structures which can be counter-productive to social advacement.
as soon as another society produces something like star wars, battlestar galactica, supreme commander (PC) or gridiron, im more than happy to jump ship. until then, i'll keep enjoying the (good) popular culture that is shipped out from the good ol US of A :) |
Ick... Us Americans have the worst habits. I prefer a jean-luc godard movie over star wars any day, anyway. |
|
|
|
|
