|
This has to stop heading towards a VERY bad future!
|
View this Thread in Original format
| metalgearsolid |
I have to say, with each passing day that dope lends more credibility to the Illuminati conspiracy theorists. If you line up the chain of events, it's no longer far fetched, but a logical conclusion.
What on earth is Bush thinking? I bet he didn't even read the entire directive. I read the entire directive. What a lot of mambo jumbo that only a seasoned bureaucrate could have written - this is an art form. How sad.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/rele...0070509-12.html
fixed? |
|
|
| venomX |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
I have to say, with each passing day that dope lends more credibility to the Illuminati conspiracy theorists. If you line up the chain of events, it's no longer far fetched, but a logical conclusion.
What on earth is Bush thinking? I bet he didn't even read the entire directive. I read the entire directive. What a lot of mambo jumbo that only a seasoned bureaucrate could have written - this is an art form. How sad.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...070509-12.html |
Link is broken... |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| fixed the link/ |
|
|
| star-traveller |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
I have to say, with each passing day that dope lends more credibility to the Illuminati conspiracy theorists. If you line up the chain of events, it's no longer far fetched, but a logical conclusion.
What on earth is Bush thinking? I bet he didn't even read the entire directive. I read the entire directive. What a lot of mambo jumbo that only a seasoned bureaucrate could have written - this is an art form. How sad.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/rele...0070509-12.html
fixed? |
what's a problem? your russian girlfriend said off to you again? |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by star-traveller
what's a problem? your russian girlfriend said off to you again? |
I'm going to tell you what a problem is: an ad hominem completely uncalled for.
Do it once more and you're going to be "on vacation" for a week. |
|
|
| TheDemon |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
I'm going to tell you what a problem is: an ad hominem completely uncalled for.
Do it once more and you're going to be "on vacation" for a week. |
What seems to be the problem? I don't see anything wrong with his comment. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by TheDemon
What seems to be the problem? I don't see anything wrong with his comment. |
His post has got no content, other than a somewhat harsh ad hominem that was completely unnecessary and out of place.
This is not the kind of behaviour wanted in a discussion forum. |
|
|
| TheDemon |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
His post has got no content, other than a somewhat harsh ad hominem that was completely unnecessary and out of place.
This is not the kind of behavior wanted in a discussion forum. |
No disrespect, but i have seen far worser things said on this website go completely unnoticed. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by TheDemon
No disrespect, but i have seen far worser things said on this website go completely unnoticed. |
On this website? Might be.
On this particular forum (the PDD)? If it went unnoticed, that's because the amount of messages is quite large for the two of us (Wicked Neo and I) to mod thoroughly. We certainly do our best, but I believe we might overlook a thing or two.
That's why we often ask users to report whatever goes against these 7 rules, as Sunsnail pointed out :) |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| What is wrong? Too much of a read for the majority of the people here? |
|
|
| Krypton |
I definatly support the rules in this forum.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
What is wrong? Too much of a read for the majority of the people here? |
Uh, dude, that document was written by a bunch of lawyers, for lawyers, and to lawyers. It's lawyer language, and I don't like it. What is 'continuity'? There needs to be a huge summary. |
|
|
|
|
