|
Virus B versus C
|
View this Thread in Original format
| flutlicht junky |
Hi
Going to be investing in some some new gear and was wondering ppl views on virus b versus c. Know about the moog filter and stuff. not bother about usb integration. Has anyone used both and what are their view on the diff for sound creation??? Have other gear in arsenal so range of sound types ot important - doesn't have to be workhorse or anything
Make trance through to freeform |
|
|
| Rusty O'Hara |
| quote: | | Originally posted by flutlicht junky Going to be investing in some some new gear and was wondering ppl views on virus b versus c. Know about the moog filter and stuff. |
OS6.5 on the C brought in the Moog filter, it's pretty cool.
| quote: | | Originally posted by flutlicht junky not bother about usb integration. |
Good, because you ain't getting it on either the B or the C. Thinking of the TI maybe?
| quote: | | Originally posted by flutlicht junky Has anyone used both and what are their view on the diff for sound creation??? Have other gear in arsenal so range of sound types ot important - doesn't have to be workhorse or anything |
Used a B, used to own a C.
Fairly similar, and I could live with a B, but the C is obviously an updated model and thus with the extra voices, and modulation routings makes it a more powerful beast for programming.
Info here if you need:
Virus Comparison Chart
Besides, the Virus range has always been well over rated. There is other synths that imho can give you better bang for your buck, both then and now versus the A, B and C when they came out. |
|
|
| echosystm |
| quote: | Originally posted by Rusty O'Hara
Besides, the Virus range has always been well over rated. |
It came with good presets :stongue: |
|
|
| thecYrus |
| quote: | | Besides, the Virus range has always been well over rated. |
just give me a synth which is as much flexible as a virus and still sounds great... i think all those modulation options are really great to create your own sounds. especially for sound designers. i have a virus b and ti - both are great in its own way. but obviously the difference between B and C is very small compared to C and TI |
|
|
| Eldritch |
Definately get the Virus C if you can.
I use the "Analog 1-4 Pole" filters for basslines and plucks. The standard lowpass filter tends to sound thin.
The added polyphony is great too. You need as much as possible to be able to use alot of unison. I think there's an EQ on the Virus C also. |
|
|
| Head Grit |
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_palm
ive been told the B lacks bass, i dont know tho. my C (rack xl realy) has ok bass, buts that not what i use it for. what i like the most with virus is all the functions with efex and mant parts etc. but im abit tired of its phasor efex and stuff. |
Whoever told you that the B lacks bass is talking pure bull dude :conf:
Ive owned both and they sound exactly the same (apart from the moog style filters and eq in the C)
when i put my B patches onto the C, they sounded just like before
The C is much easier to program since they changed the front panel
Moog filters sound cool and can add some nice grit, to say they sound like real moog filters or even an analog filter is maybe an overstatement though
EQ is useful for an extra boost but not essential, although one awesome thing is that you can modulate the EQ peaks! to use them like notch filters
more useful to D&B producers than you trance guys but you'll still find its nice for pads :) |
|
|
|
|
