|
how much can e6600 take ? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| echosystm |
| quote: | Originally posted by -_1_--Ben--_1_-
it takes at least 2 years before i could have something worth buying. |
so... why exactly are you trying to produce at 4 times the sample rate of professionals? think about it son. |
|
|
| -_1_--Ben--_1_- |
i think i just buy a slightly noisy case with an overclocked e4300 on same speed as e6600 and just keep on 24/44.
but, that nordlead sounds best on 24/192, on 44 it`s not that worthy,
vst`s can produce that sound.
i don`t know what pro`s use, gues an apogee thing on 24/192.
but i don`t know it yet, about the pc, it won`t be very good for the nl3. |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| Are you even reading what people here are trying to tell you? |
|
|
| -_1_--Ben--_1_- |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Are you even reading what people here are trying to tell you? |
sure :) are you ? |
|
|
| Khayat |
Well...IMO i would concentrate on the sound and the structure then concentrate on the quality of the recording...but if you wanna do this and you think you have to then buy yourself a Super expensive Digi design protools system thats compatible with Pro tools HD and record ur music 192 :o
My personal advice: Think again about it |
|
|
| -_1_--Ben--_1_- |
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_palm
VERY much better? i cant hear diferent when changing from 16bit/44 to 24/192 which my soundcard supports. i havent tryed that much but i kinda doubt the diferens is that big? u cant hear above 20kHz anyway. I think ur mind is fooling you. U have decided that its better and thats why u think it do too, and it even might do too. To you. |
haha, maybe your monitor/speakers doesn`t support it ?
(to tell the difference)
but the difference that it makes is very important to me, it
feels better, more low, frequencies disappear from the nl3 on 24/44
the nordlead is 44, it still loses quality on same inputs.
but directly on a receiver it`s even better then 24/192.
i don`t know that much, but what i hear is important to me.
i just want to get the best quality out of things for the lowest amount of money.
or, i don`t want to insult you, but did you go to houseparty`s a lot or something and have some eardamage ?
i know my hearing isn`t perfect, but i can hardly imagine you don`t hear the difference.
my mind ain`t fooling me, and it`s mainly in the lower frequencys
sounds disappear.
i know it sounds odd, but i definitely notice the sound differencs
i can even feel it.(on low volumes)
maybe i`m to sensitive
maybe try it some more otherwise dj palm, i didn`t decided it`s better without listening to it properly.
i switched very often from 44 to 192 and back, because the pc couldn`t handle 192, but when i played the synth standalone on 192
it definitely sounds better.
and not "slightly" better, but way better.
(in case of you would want to know which soundcard i have, i have an emu1820m)
edit: is there a chance that an external mixer sounds as good as my receiver ?
it`s just a simple receiver but it`s easy just as good(better) as 24/192 on my soundcard.
not that i`m going to buy hardware suddenly, but just maybe for the future, with a nice korg ms 20 :-P
which i can buy from what i save on my new pc.
or just stay on vst`s but the one says 3 vst`s and the other 12 ¿ <-confusing |
|
|
| echosystm |
you're a lost cause.
go learn what sample rate actually is and stop being a retard. |
|
|
| -_1_--Ben--_1_- |
| quote: | Originally posted by echosystm
you're a lost cause.
go learn what sample rate actually is and stop being a retard. |
o sure.. :)
anyone who knows more then just acting stupid ? |
|
|
| Massive84 |
it's the thing that you will only see on the TA forum
Make a topic about cars? And you'll end up talking about ropes or something? |
|
|
| -_1_--Ben--_1_- |
well, i don`t mind talking about samplerates, if everybody just acts normal and if he/she knows more i`m glad to hear it, but not things like that guy above(echosystm), that`s just worthless.
if you know more tell it then..
and, theory ain`t allways real in practise.
and what if, people only hear untill a certain amount of hz,
do they only have ears or can we also feel some pressure with our body.
someone who don`t understand this will act foolish and say i`m a fool,
but no message from that kind of behaviour.
but, enough of that, they`re really simple questions for people who know enough about producing with pc,mixers and/or (higher then standard) soundcards.
so i keep waiting untill that mister or misses niceguy/woman :-P
can tell me more.
and if you ask me what pro`s use, i don`t know, i`m not a pro
and i don`t know any.
and if you don`t also, you can`t really help me with asking
"what do you think pro`s use" :-P
just tell it then.
and how they do it, with dat recorders and stuf, i don`t mind,
just tell it :) |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| Right, now you're not even trying to make sense anymore. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
Ben's actually right on this one. It will really not make any percievable difference on soft synths but when recording instruments or expternal sources, there is a noticeable difference in quality for 192 systems when finally rendering/recording down to 44.1. Certain strings for instance have harmonics that can only be captured at these higher sample rates and aftifacts of these harmonics still remain once rendred down. The same can be said of deep bass notes, where many producers swear than an extra fatness/warmth/depth of colour/whatever remains using this method.
Also, why do you think Avid/Lynx/Whoever make 192 systems? Just for playback or recording the final master on to tape?
Having said all this, so many other factors will render the benefits of this viod, such as quality of overall production techniques, the other equipment in the recording system or DAW, the final reproduction medium (club sound system/Audiophile hifi etc.).
Also, not wanting to take anything away from it, but we're making trance on home computers, not recording the philarmonic orchestra at Air. |
|
|
|
|
