|
Back to the Future Part 3.
|
View this Thread in Original format
| trewqy |
Great trilogy imo..but part 3 was totally redundant imo.
In 1885 there were 2 deloreans. One was the "zapped by lightning delorean" in 1955 which happened in part 2.This delorean had the time machine computer all wacked and is faulty.
The other was the one marty brought back from 1955 which had the gas tank punctured.
Now why not just skip the whole train thingy and just patch up the gas tank and just siphon filter the gas from the "lightning delorean" and get on with it.
Time Paradox. |
|
|
| _Nut_ |
| too many "imo's" imo. |
|
|
| trewqy |
| I guess ur right.imo. |
|
|
| stren |
| there are more inconsistencies in the series, still its fun and I don't care |
|
|
| david.michael |
| quote: | Originally posted by stren
there are more inconsistencies in the series, still its fun and I don't care |
+1... much of it is like that, but who cares... it's cheesy 80's fun and I love 'em. |
|
|
| montana |
| i always liked how the schoolteacher got all her luggage into the canyon, and in the next scene Marty & Doc is carrying them |
|
|
| hadi burpee |
| quote: | Originally posted by montana
i always liked how the schoolteacher got all her luggage into the canyon, and in the next scene Marty & Doc is carrying them |
haha, i was watching it on tv on saturday and i only saw that part. |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by trewqy
Great trilogy imo..but part 3 was totally redundant imo.
In 1885 there were 2 deloreans. One was the "zapped by lightning delorean" in 1955 which happened in part 2.This delorean had the time machine computer all wacked and is faulty.
The other was the one marty brought back from 1955 which had the gas tank punctured.
Now why not just skip the whole train thingy and just patch up the gas tank and just siphon filter the gas from the "lightning delorean" and get on with it.
Time Paradox. |
yes as mentioned above, "imo" is redundancy at its best.
i must say though, how back to the future 2 ended was fantastic. when they give him the letter right after doc gets sent back into the past... and then he goes and finds the young doc who just sent him back into the future....:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
they dont make them like that anymore. so in conclusion 3 was the worst out of the 3, but i still find it to be worth my 2 hours of viewing. |
|
|
| SuspicionVandit |
1. The OP makes sense.
2. BTTF3 was horrible.
3. Time for a prequel |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| quote: | Originally posted by SuspicionVandit
3. Time for a prequel |
FORWARD TO THE PAST?!?!?!?!?! |
|
|
| yujie__ |
| Zoolander > Back to the future 3 |
|
|
| PatMcGroin |
LMAO! true i guess. but the reason i laugh is the fact that i was bored in class today and i saw the word "flux" on an overhead slide and instead of listening to my professor, i ran through the 3 movies in my head cuz i was so in bored.
:haha: |
|
|
|
|
