|
Federer wins a record breaking $2.4 MILLION Dollars (U.S.) for the U.S. Open!
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Jem_hadar |
WOW.
Unbelievable. Federer just won the U.S. Open 2007, but he didn't only win the 1.4 million dollars for that tourney...
he also won an ADDITIONAL 1.0 million dollars for winning the U.S. Open series coming into this final Grand Slam!
UNBELIEVABLE. Jesus. 2.4 MILLION DOLLARS winning after a tennis tournament. Just amazing. :crazy: |
|
|
| Jem_hadar |
ALSO:
The U.S. Open is now ranked #1 as the most highly attended ever annual tournament event in the world!!
WOW. Another simply incredible record attached to tennis!
Bra-ing-vo!
GO TENNIS! |
|
|
| Invasionmix |
| Damn Federer he's just so damn good, except on clay court, can't wait for the next French Open, hopefully he'll finally win. |
|
|
| jeeper_095 |
let's all start playing tennis maybe one of us is gonna win the equivalent of 2.4 mil in couple of years from now. :D :D :D :D
Congrats to him; took a lot of effort to get there. |
|
|
| Spin Laden |
| pfft. If Tiger wins next week, he gets 10M |
|
|
| Jem_hadar |
| quote: | Originally posted by Invasionmix
except on clay court, . |
WHAT!!?!?
Are u serious???
That there is a player (Nadal) that matches (exceeds apparently) Fed's ability on that surface , does NOT take about from HOW GOOD Federer is on that surface.
The man's ing INSANE on that surface as well, I'd say almost equally as good (almost).
The thing is, there just happen to be 1 person who EXCELS at that surface even more than him... Nadal.
But that in no way means the man isnt "good" on clay. Fed's a ing clay master was well.
And its a hard surface for 75% of hte top ranked players... clay is almsot ALL of hte top 5 or 10 players worst surface. That fed is quite practically just as good on clay as he is on grass and hardcord says VOLUMES about how insanely good he is overall.
No, you cannot say that Federer isnt beyond amazing on Clay either. You simply cannot. |
|
|
| Spin Laden |
| Feds is actually much better on clay than Sampras ever was, even. |
|
|
| Oreo_The_Cookie |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jem_hadar
WHAT!!?!?
Are u serious???
That there is a player (Nadal) that matches (exceeds apparently) Fed's ability on that surface , does NOT take about from HOW GOOD Federer is on that surface.
The man's ing INSANE on that surface as well, I'd say almost equally as good (almost).
The thing is, there just happen to be 1 person who EXCELS at that surface even more than him... Nadal.
But that in no way means the man isnt "good" on clay. Fed's a ing clay master was well.
And its a hard surface for 75% of hte top ranked players... clay is almsot ALL of hte top 5 or 10 players worst surface. That fed is quite practically just as good on clay as he is on grass and hardcord says VOLUMES about how insanely good he is overall.
No, you cannot say that Federer isnt beyond amazing on Clay either. You simply cannot. |
Thank you, you saved me from having to type out the exact same reply :p |
|
|
| Jem_hadar |
OH... forgot to add, he also won a ing BRAND NEW LEXUS IS 350 luxury sedan!
. What a killing he made. Jesus that is a BRILLIANT car, esp for FREE! :D
The IS 250 RW is my DREAM CAR! :tongue2 |
|
|
| Invasionmix |
| I didn't mean he's crappy on clay or anything, I meant that it's gonna be really tuff for him to win the French open and have that notch on his belt, it's gonna be really bad if he retires without having that award. He still has a few years to go. Makes me wonder when Federer, will Nadal, Djokovic (sp?), Roddick, etc. have the type of supremacy that Federer had, cause they're all really young. |
|
|
| Spin Laden |
| maybe Djokovic.. Nadal's body won't hold up probably, Roddick is getting up there (he's one year younger than Federer) and is unfortunately playing in the Federer era. |
|
|
| Invasionmix |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jem_hadar
The U.S. Open is now ranked #1 as the most highly attended ever annual tournament event in the world!!
|
Well even more than the Super Bowl, or any FIFA event? |
|
|
|
|
