|
RJT goes squirrelshit nuts and closes the Will Smith thread! (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
|
I like your av. |
|
|
| Ted Promo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Clovis
Rob & Myra need a meth lab.
That would be so fun. |
Rob without hair and teeth - so enticing! |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ted Promo
Rob without hair and teeth - so enticing! |
Hes got no hair... its the only logical step forward. |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
So glad we have your blessing.
I think I will refrain, however - as I said, the topic was , it's just that I thought closing threads because they made your vagina hurt was something reserved for gimps like tbills.
See, pretentious cockery is entertaining when you are trying to impress 16 year-old girls, but I don't quite know who you are trying to front for.
But keep on keepin' on with the whole egocentricism. We are all here just for you and promise to adhere only to your sensible expectations. :gsmile:
elicit. |
No worries sweetpea - I've enjoyed watching you emotionally invest yourself more and more each day with proving your intellect in the most worthless of affairs on here as well, so I look forward to seeing your further deep analysis and rants regarding both me and my posts here on TA. 
Shame so much potential has proven such a waste. |
|
|
| Spacey Orange |
i don't know what's going on here, but this thread is as good as any to post a Rerun gif. you can thank me later.
 |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| quote: | Originally posted by st3nc
i like to imagine this is what Will's penis looks like...futuristic and cool...
does this sparkle with everybody??? |
yes. but it's not purple, and it doesn't sparkle. sorry ladies |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by tubularbills
yes. but it's not purple, and it doesn't sparkle. sorry ladies |
You lie. |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
You lie. |
:eek: |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
No worries sweetpea - I've enjoyed watching you emotionally invest yourself more and more each day with proving your intellect in the most worthless of affairs on here as well, so I look forward to seeing your further deep analysis and rants regarding both me and my posts here on TA.
Shame so much potential has proven such a waste. |
Fine, fine - worthless affairs point conceded, but emotional investment? :stongue:
This forum is a fun thing to do in the bored hours of my quiet job.
I don't quite know what you are on about with potential, Dr. Freud, but I assure you that you're only coming off as more presumptuous by the post.
Not that I don't find an iota of entertainment in observing your habits.
";)"
/cue ridiculously poser sort of cockney |
|
|
| Inertia |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ang ' ela_ie
I posted on another message board that I think the whole thing is dumb. The media just jumps at anything that appears to be antisemitism because they know it will get a reaction and Jewish people will get all riled up, further enhancing the following of the story.
They pulled my post and a bunch of crazy people are mad at me because they think Im antisemitic.
Right.... |
ok but, basically, what you're saying all jews will overreact regardless of how ridiculous a story is, if it smells of antisemitism, which will lead to a development of a sensationalist crowd to follow said story? |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| Mmmm, squirrel nuts. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Whom. ;) |
Nope, not really.
Regarding the subject of the sentence, "he" is fronting for someone, by all implications. If "him" was fronting for someone, then it would be "whom", but since that's inaccurate grammar, it is "who".
//but really, he used the completely wrong word there. You cannot "illicit" something - it's not even a verb, it's an adjective.
///Let this thread continue as grammatical pedantry
////I love you, RJT. :toothless |
|
|
|
|
