|
Lord of the Rings vs Star Wars... Whats the best trilogy???
|
View this Thread in Original format
| 72hrpartyanimal |
I liked both...
but L.O.T.R movies rocked way better... |
|
|
| Alain |
whatever we should just add a third night to the anniversary and it will be the best trilogy of all
:haha: :haha: |
|
|
| 72hrpartyanimal |
| quote: | Originally posted by Alain
whatever we should just add a third night to the anniversary and it will be the best trilogy of all
:haha: :haha: |
hahahahaha... Very TRUE!!! |
|
|
| Mecca82 |
i have to go with 'Star Wars' on this one epi. 4,5,6
but the best of it all is
THE GODFATER trilogy
followed by
Indiana Jones |
|
|
| 72hrpartyanimal |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mecca82
i have to go with 'Star Wars' on this one epi. 4,5,6
but the best of it all is
THE GODFATER trilogy
followed by
Indiana Jones |
agreed on the GodFather... and also agree on eps. 4,5,6 |
|
|
| bas |
| What kind of stupid question is that? Star Wars s all over Lord Of The Rings! |
|
|
| progressiveMOJO |
considering that The Lord of the Rings is a BOOK and actually is in 6 "books" split between 3 volumes, I don't think it belongs in the same category of comparison with movie trilogies that were originally written for the screen (star wars, indiana jones, etc). This is important because while the book is one of the greatest stories of all time, the movies (other than Fellowship, which almost got it right) were AWFUL and completely failed to capture the important parts of the book, favoring the usual special effects bash instead of preserving the personalities of the characters intact from the book. Also, the book pisses all over everything else that's been mentioned in this thread.
The Godfather would win hands-down in the movie trilogy category if you were able to delete Part 3 and still call it a trilogy, and even then it's a close call because parts 1 and 2 are some of my favorite movies ever. In the end, I have to give it to Star Wars (and by that I mean the original trilogy, the new movies aren't Star Wars at all as far as I'm concerned and I flatly refuse to watch them ever again). |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by 72hrpartyanimal
I liked both...
but L.O.T.R movies rocked way better... |
 |
|
|
| Andrieux |
Back to the Future :thepirate
Hoverboards are the coolest things ever. |
|
|
| bas |
Back To The Future would be SICK if it weren't for the 3rd one :(
ps
Nice to meet you on Friday :p |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by bas
Back To The Future would be SICK if it weren't for the 3rd one :(
ps
Nice to meet you on Friday :p |
true, it was still nice how every movie tied in with the older one, not plot wise... like everytime he would get called chiken, and wake up to his mum etc. |
|
|
| 72hrpartyanimal |
| quote: | Originally posted by progressiveMOJO
considering that The Lord of the Rings is a BOOK and actually is in 6 "books" split between 3 volumes, I don't think it belongs in the same category of comparison with movie trilogies that were originally written for the screen (star wars, indiana jones, etc). This is important because while the book is one of the greatest stories of all time, the movies (other than Fellowship, which almost got it right) were AWFUL and completely failed to capture the important parts of the book, favoring the usual special effects bash instead of preserving the personalities of the characters intact from the book. Also, the book pisses all over everything else that's been mentioned in this thread.
|
What got me thinking of this is this site about the Sith:
http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/sith1.htm
I didn't realize how far back the Star Wars, Force thing went back...
after reading... I thought the Sith were actually pretty cool and Jedi's were a bunch of... well... soccer players!
(RAIDER NATION!!!)
ps... if you haven't figured it out, the raider nation is my safty wink until i find one of those happy things for it
????(Trin)???? |
|
|
|
|
