|
New Torq 1.5 In-Depth video (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| miamitranceman |
| quote: | Originally posted by Neo95gt
I can't believe people are bitching about the $50 pricetag, get a freggin job.
I've been in the market for a VDJ lately, I might have to pull the trigger on this one. So I get Torq for $200 and i get the $50 update for free? |
Yep, just wait 'till it's released of course. ;) |
|
|
| SteelWolf |
| ^Audtogain is a big plus, no more overdriving tracks unintentionally. Its teh same timestretch as Abelton? NO wonder. Wow I can't wait! |
|
|
| Lover Boy |
| Does anyone know what the pitch resolution is when using Torq with the Xponent? Used a Behringer BCD3000 on Traktor and I got a resolution of 0.2%! Could do with 0.02% really for those monster mixes. |
|
|
| skip |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lover Boy
Does anyone know what the pitch resolution is when using Torq with the Xponent? Used a Behringer BCD3000 on Traktor and I got a resolution of 0.2%! Could do with 0.02% really for those monster mixes. |
i think the main problem with using a midi controller as a pitch fader for any program is that midi only has 128 different signals, so if you would like to get 0,02% accuracy, your pitch range should then be ±1,28% which is not very much. ;) |
|
|
| IntegraR0064 |
| quote: | Originally posted by skip
i think the main problem with using a midi controller as a pitch fader for any program is that midi only has 128 different signals, so if you would like to get 0,02% accuracy, your pitch range should then be �1,28% which is not very much. ;) |
This is true. It's such a minor problem though...I can't believe that no one has fixed this somehow yet.
What would be ideal is if you had two pitch faders. One with .2% resolution, then a "fine tuning" one that adjusts by .02% or .01%. And they add together.
So you would get it within 1% or so with the normal pitch fader, then use the fine tuning fader to get it perfectly locked.
Of course this would probably require that the program supported this, but that would be like, 5 seconds of programming to add the possibility... |
|
|
| IntegraR0064 |
| quote: | Originally posted by IntegraR0064
This is true. It's such a minor problem though...I can't believe that no one has fixed this somehow yet.
What would be ideal is if you had two pitch faders. One with .2% resolution, then a "fine tuning" one that adjusts by .02% or .01%. And they add together.
So you would get it within 1% or so with the normal pitch fader, then use the fine tuning fader to get it perfectly locked.
Of course this would probably require that the program supported this, but that would be like, 5 seconds of programming to add the possibility... |
Now that I think about it, you could even probably do this with just one pitch fader - just have it output 2 separate midi messages. It would be slightly more complicated than just using two faders, but I'm sure it would be doable. |
|
|
| Lover Boy |
| This is the problem I found with Traktor, I got fed up of continually adjusting my mixes to keep them in time when using a Midi controller. Hopefully Torq will solve that problem, though I feel like a cheat asking the computer to do it for me. |
|
|
| Lover Boy |
| Does anyone have a final release date yet? |
|
|
| miamitranceman |
The official word is end of 1st Q 2008 (March 31st or earlier).
Cross your fingers. |
|
|
| Sadface |
| I hope this comes out soon... |
|
|
|
|
