return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Music Discussion

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 
Sasha - Coma (pg. 5)
View this Thread in Original format
Soeder
quote:
Originally posted by Guest
I'll never understand the "it doesnt go somewhere" argument....for me presonally, it doesnt have anything to do with anything

I second that (or third)
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by Guest
I'll never understand the "it doesnt go somewhere" argument....for me presonally, it doesnt have anything to do with anything




"it doesn't go somewhere" means (from what i get) that the tune doesn't have a theme or a clear idea, but, as in the current case, uses lots of filling elements like all sorts of effects or micro-melodies that sound like they are created for the purpose of filling the track (music-by-numbers) not for the purpose of personal artistic expression...as is the case here...! There is nothing musical about the current track and studio trickery doesn't equal musicality.


I have to say though that the remixes of "Coma" are definitelly the most "directional" of all the EmFire tarcks which IMO (and in most cases) sound like generic and souless clinical bollocks. The dj three dub is more trancey and warm, whereas the Ki: Theory is a nice downtempo number which IMO is the best one. Still, they are nothing special.
MrJiveBoJingles
quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
"it doesn't go somewhere" means (from what i get) that the tune doesn't have a theme or a clear idea, but, as in the current case, uses lots of filling elements like all sorts of effects or micro-melodies that sound like they are created for the purpose of filling the track (music-by-numbers) not for the purpose of personal artistic expression

Exactly.

So many tracks seem like they were made by people who were producing for the sake of producing, not by someone who really wanted to transform feeling into sound or sound into feeling.

It seems like lots of tracks aren't "expressions" of anything, but just the end result of semi-randomly filling in blank space in a sequencer until something "release-worthy" happens to come together.

For so many electronic musicians the "electronic" part seems to be overshadowing the "musician" part...

But who knows -- maybe I'm just being cynical or obtuse and the producers of all these effects-extravaganzas really did put feeling into each track.
Palladium
all last sasha's releases seem to me like building an airdrawndagger 2
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Exactly.

So many tracks seem like they were made by people who were producing for the sake of producing, not by someone who really wanted to transform feeling into sound or sound into feeling.

It seems like lots of tracks aren't "expressions" of anything, but just the end result of semi-randomly filling in blank space in a sequencer until something "release-worthy" happens to come together.

For so many electronic musicians the "electronic" part seems to be overshadowing the "musician" part...

But who knows -- maybe I'm just being cynical or obtuse and the producers of all these effects-extravaganzas really did put feeling into each track.



Yes i totally agree with you. I don't think its just you, i think that many people feel like that when they listen to such heavy-in-effects-without-being-music music (the early prog-house and trance tracks we posted in other threads represent the opposite from this, that is, direct, in your face emotion with the effects supporting-rather then creating- the track) and i can't clearly see what kind of feeling they put in such tracks, unless we are talking about reallyyy strange feelings here...
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by Palladium
all last sasha's releases seem to me like building an airdrawndagger 2



Depends...does Charlie May "help" sasha in these tracks?:p
SMC
quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
Yes i totally agree with you. I don't think its just you, i think that many people feel like that when they listen to such heavy-in-effects-without-being-music music (the early prog-house and trance tracks we posted in other threads represent the opposite from this, that is, direct, in your face emotion with the effects supporting-rather then creating- the track) and i can't clearly see what kind of feeling they put in such tracks, unless we are talking about reallyyy strange feelings here...


I don't understand how any of this can be applied to Coma however. It has an easily discernernable melody or theme. The person that says otherwise hasn't listened to it.
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by SMC
I don't understand how any of this can be applied to Coma however. It has an easily discernernable melody or theme. The person that says otherwise hasn't listened to it.




Yea, a 3-note generic melody is played at some point, somewhere under all sorts of bleeps, zaps, squeeks, washes, winds ...


great theme indeed full of emotion



p.s i have listened to coma
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by Mattsanity
yeah and I thought airdrandagger was garbage. way too ambient for my taste. he should be making more songs like Xpander. airdrawndagger was boring as heck. it's like he was trying too hard to impress his audience by making cute little mellow and smooth melodies and beats throughout the whole album. how about he goes back to that vintage 90's prog house via those classic compilations with digweed



So airdrawndagger was "to ambient for your taste" so it was crap...
MrJiveBoJingles
quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
Yea, a 3-note generic melody is played at some point, somewhere under all sorts of bleeps, zaps, squeeks, washes, winds ...

Four notes, actually: Gb, Bb, Eb, F. ;)

SMC
quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
Yea, a 3-note generic melody is played at some point, somewhere under all sorts of bleeps, zaps, squeeks, washes, winds ...


great theme indeed full of emotion



p.s i have listened to coma



If you had listened to it you would have noticed the melody consists of 8 notes, not 3.




EDIT:

It's also funny that you praise the DJ Three Dub which is based pretty much on the elements of the original but OMITS the melody. That completely contradicts your point.
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by SMC
If you had listened to it you would have noticed the melody consists of 8 notes, not 3.



Seriously? This is an 8-note track!? lol. Well anyway if you mean this generic sequenced arpeggio as a "melody" then what can i say...to each his own i guess...
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 
Privacy Statement