|
Why is Cannabalism wrong? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| julien2 |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
?????????? |
Kant said something like "the universalization of the action renders the principle impossible", or something like that.
The meaning: If everyone is cannibal, the human species will die. And that's why its immoral.
Some thing with killing, for example.
The funny thing is that many people still think that cannibalism has once been common in primitive societies.
The fact is that cannibalism is a very, very, very very very very very, very....very rare thing in the history of mankind.
So why do many people think it existed ? Because the idea of cannibalism has been used to "demonize" the "others.
In other words, one tribe would say "they are wrong, they are the human flesh eaters", to motivate attack and war. |
|
|
| noikeee |
| Go take your meds, Ashley. |
|
|
| dj_alfi |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
but if your relative is already dead... then you arn't exactly killing them.
I'm really wondering why humans let so much meat go to waste...
the disease thing works but it is not universal, is it, this is only one instance of there being a disease in a group.. then they canabalized people with that illness etc....
I really don't get it, there is a global food crisis, yet canabilism is taboo...? it is meat and chemicals ain't it,... it's not like you are killing people to eat them.. something the food industry does to animals.. what would be so bad about eating human's that have passed on and arn't diseased.. like heart attacks etc..
Look at populations in China and India.. think how much food they need for their billions.. surely eating their dead would reduce the needs of their food requirements.. likewise in North America with so many FAT people.. the fat on their bodies would keep a family of four alive for a week or two or three or month or so depending on the person.
Like wouldn't some dead relative in a famine struck area.. be a meal or two to their family?
The donner party did it so did a number of ship wrecks etc...
... why is it so wrong for you to eat your loved one if it save 3 living loved ones...? |
would you eat your mom?
and if so, what part would you eat first? |
|
|
| Project-K |
| The skin is the best part. |
|
|
| nefardec |
 |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
In the famous Donner party case, the only people who unfailingly refused to eat human flesh were the two "savage" Indian guides.
:rolleyes:
They eventually froze to death and were eaten, of course. |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| I would try human i think. In reality, the minute they serve it to me i would vomit. |
|
|
| medinaM5 |
2 cannibals are munchin on a clown and one says to other "does this taste funny to you?"
lol? |
|
|
| Floorfiller |
| if you eat me...promise me that you clean your plate |
|
|
| AustralianGQ |
| its wrong, b/c ur killing someone without their consent, no one wants to die to be somene elses food. we eat domesticated animals b/c they are domesticated for human consumption, humans are not. |
|
|
| Floorfiller |
| quote: | Originally posted by AustralianGQ
its wrong, b/c ur killing someone without their consent, no one wants to die to be somene elses food. we eat domesticated animals b/c they are domesticated for human consumption, humans are not. |
so it's cool to eat people if they consent first? |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by AustralianGQ
its wrong, b/c ur killing someone without their consent, no one wants to die to be somene elses food. we eat domesticated animals b/c they are domesticated for human consumption, humans are not. |
The only reason I wouldn't eat you, is because you're stupid. |
|
|
|
|
