|
Paul Oakenfold - Perfecto On Tour 081 - live @ Sensation White, Budapest Hungary
|
View this Thread in Original format
| PhilN |
code:
ARTIST....: Paul Oakenfold
TITLE.....: Perfecto On Tour - Budapest Hungary-SAT-05-03
GENRE.....: Trance
SUBGENRE..: n/a
SOURCE....: Live Session
RELDATE...: Jun-21-2008
AiRDATE...: 000-00-0000
TRACKS....: 01
LENGTH....: 118:17 min
SIZE......: 132,7 MB
QUALITY...: VBRkbps
NR. NAME. TiME:
..........................................................
01. Perfecto On Tour - Budapest Hungary-SAT-05-03- 118:17
TOTAL: 118:1t
RELNOTES..:
Perfecto on Tour 81 - live from Sensation White, Budapest Hungary.
DOWNLOAD:
http://www.trancef.com/dl?f=Paul_Oa...ANCEF.COM--.rar |
|
|
| leonsv |
This is POT 68.
Again incorrect release from talion ? |
|
|
| jmrecillas |
| :whip: I think we better wait to see if Sirius broadcast this same episode or a new one for real. Normally PoT appears more later, not so early. |
|
|
| gloryx85 |
| dont download it, correct release will be next week, stay tuned ;) |
|
|
| jmrecillas |
| quote: | Originally posted by gloryx85
dont download it, correct release will be next week, stay tuned ;) |
Next week? Thats weird, but I'll be waiting. Thanks. |
|
|
| morfeodomenico |
this is a fake
pot 81 is online 26/06 |
|
|
| ga11agher |
| online where??? |
|
|
| jmrecillas |
| quote: | Originally posted by morfeodomenico
this is a fake
pot 81 is online 26/06 |
Well, we are at 28, and there is no PoT at sight. Any news? Somebody? |
|
|
| jmrecillas |
| quote: | Originally posted by morfeodomenico
this is a fake
pot 81 is online 26/06 |
What the heck? :whip: Its already realeased PoT 92, and never was released PoT 81. Are we jocking and jerking around or what? |
|
|
| ga11agher |
So #82 has been released (Geneva, Switzerland 05-09-2008), but no sign of #81.
So do we class this one as another repeat of #68??? |
|
|
| jmrecillas |
| quote: | Originally posted by ga11agher
So #82 has been released (Geneva, Switzerland 05-09-2008), but no sign of #81.
So do we class this one as another repeat of #68??? |
I don't classify repeated sets, so in practical terms this set does not exist, eve if officially there is a set wit this name. :whip: |
|
|
|
|
