return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Music Discussion

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
For an Angel is very over rated (pg. 2)
View this Thread in Original format
Guest
quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
This is music discussion. If you don't like the topic at hand then leave the thread.


pahahaha you told that person
RJT
quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
This is music discussion. If you don't like the topic at hand then leave the thread.


You could have also left this entire topic to the thread about "For an Angel" that was recently created (i.e. moments before yours) instead of creating what is probably the 789320935959023th "For an Angel suxx0rz" thread to have been created here.
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
This is music discussion. If you don't like the topic at hand then leave the thread.




Yeah, like very "constructive and deep music discussion" on how "for an angel" sucks...


ROFL
DOOMBOT
quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
Yeah, like very "constructive and deep music discussion" on how "for an angel" sucks...


ROFL

Didn't realize that I had to write an in depth composition on my oppinion of the track. Mind pointing those rules out to me somewhere? I guess I missed it while signing up for this place.

ROFL
DOOMBOT
quote:
Originally posted by RJT
You could have also left this entire topic to the thread about "For an Angel" that was recently created (i.e. moments before yours) instead of creating what is probably the 789320935959023th "For an Angel suxx0rz" thread to have been created here.

Thanks for the bump.
Clovis
quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
This is music discussion. If you don't like the topic at hand then leave the thread.


quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Didn't realize that I had to write an in depth composition on my oppinion of the track. Mind pointing those rules out to me somewhere? I guess I missed it while signing up for this place.

ROFL



None of these are valid excuses for this thread.
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Didn't realize that I had to write an in depth composition on my oppinion of the track. Mind pointing those rules out to me somewhere? I guess I missed it while signing up for this place.

ROFL




This is not about your depth of your opinion, (which ofcourse as you noted there is none), this is about the very subject itself that is retarted. What kind of constructive music discussion can you do about how a tune sucks? These type of threads never lead to anything constructive but to the usual TA flame-war. Want to make a serious "music discussion" thread? Start a thread on what elements you like on some tracks or not like on others (like for the "overrated for an angel") or something like that. Starting a thread about how a specific trance-hit from the 90s sucks is stupid-as- seriously.
DOOMBOT
quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
None of these are valid excuses for this thread.

Hey man, thanks for your input.
DOOMBOT
quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
This is not about your depth of your opinion, (which ofcourse as you noted there is none), this is about the very subject itself that is retarted. What kind of constructive music discussion can you do about how a tune sucks? These type of threads never lead to anything constructive but to the usual TA flame-war. Want to make a serious "music discussion" thread? Start a thread on what elements you like on some tracks or not like on others (like for the "overrated for an angel") or something like that. Starting a thread about how a specific trance-hit from the 90s sucks is stupid-as- seriously.

The first sentence of this post looks like it was written by a 2nd grader. Didn't read the rest. Sorry!
Scoops

PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
The first sentence of this post looks like it was written by a 2nd grader. Didn't read the rest. Sorry!



Ok, instead of "the depth of your opinion" i wrote, "your depth of your opinion", i made a typo. Don't worry, judging by the subject of this thread and by your current attitude, i still know better English than you.
DOOMBOT
quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
Ok, instead of "the depth of your opinion" i wrote, "your depth of your opinion", i made a typo. Don't worry, judging by the subject of this thread and by your current attitude, i still know better English than you.

Whatever keeps you happy. :)

Oh, almost forgot... ROFL
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
Privacy Statement