Originally posted by Q5echo
i agree. changing the subject is very offensive.
Well, you're criticizing the Democratic candidate, but when your candidate is likewise, criticized, you authoritarians can't stand it...Fits perfectly into the profile of an authoritarian follower.... Intolerance to criticism.
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
Well, you're criticizing the Democratic candidate, but when your candidate is likewise, criticized, you authoritarians can't stand it...Fits perfectly into the profile of an authoritarian follower.... Intolerance to criticism.
i don't want Obama to president. i have certain goals. thats it.
youre reading waaayyy too much into it.
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
i don't want Obama to president. i have certain goals. thats it.
youre reading waaayyy too much into it.
I already know where your loyalty lies. You criticize Obama. Fine. We criticize McCain. In fact, Lebez was criticizing both by saying they're both pandering politicians (which is what they do)...
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
I already know where your loyalty lies. You criticize Obama. Fine. We criticize McCain. In fact, Lebez was criticizing both by saying they're both pandering politicians (which is what they do)...
right, but wtf is this dubious crap you jackasses are talking about!!!!!!
and how the hell can you equivocate wtfever it is youre talking about with Obama/Rezko?
The17sss
Q is right, essentially, all the regulation or de-regulation in the world doesn't matter when you have bad management. Why the are the same people who were present while this disaster came about still involved, leading, and making decisions?
You guys can debate weather or not you think Q's video's facts are real or not, but there's no spinning this: democrat after democrat lying in a hearing in 2004 saying there was nothing wrong or needing to be fixed with Freddie and Fannie.
Take a good look through this video in 2004, and ask yourself who on this panel wanted more regulatory oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and which members spent their time attacking the regulators. When Barack Obama talks at debates about how the past eight years of regulatory laissez-faire created the problem, he may want to review the transcripts of these hearings and note that Democrats repeatedly undermined regulators and called them everything from incompetent to bigoted in their rush to keep the status quo at Fannie and Freddie.
The Democrats attacking the regulator here didn’t do so out of some deep conviction against government regulation. They wanted to keep the gravy train rolling on questionable mortgages in order to endear themselves to the working class, and didn’t mind smearing the OFHEO regulator as a racist in order to succeed. The Republicans who wanted more oversight didn’t demand it as socialists looking for a government takeover of the financial sector, either, but because they saw the impending disaster looming for Fannie Mae.
josh4
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
watch this. it might open your eyes.
btw, Tony Rezko. that is all
This is ridiculous. Leave it to Q to post a political video so bad it gets removed from YouTube. Funny how you'd lambast "documentaries" like Loose Change yet endorse crap like that.
Still waiting on your analysis of the Palin debacle, Q. Or haven't you noticed the many threads tearing into her begging for your defense?
Lebezniatnikov
Silly Republicans.
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by josh4
This is ridiculous. Leave it to Q to post a political video so bad it gets removed from YouTube. Funny how you'd lambast "documentaries" like Loose Change yet endorse crap like that.
there was nothing in that video that you couldn't EASILY verify for yourself. in fact if you watched it, it encouraged you to apply your own keyboard to the situation. simple stuff.
josh4
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
there was nothing in that video that you couldn't EASILY verify for yourself. in fact if you watched it, it encouraged you to apply your own keyboard to the situation. simple stuff.
I'll acknowledge and hash through the points in your videos when you acknowledge and hash through my points on Palin.
Magnetonium
Big thanks to Opus for his input, otherwise I almost fell for that YouTube video. Because all this time I was wondering why the media hasnt picked up on this alleged Democrats blame game. The facts aren't so factual in the video ... it seems.
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by josh4
I'll acknowledge and hash through the points in your videos when you acknowledge and hash through my points on Palin.
wtf does Palin have anything to do with this other than satisfying your own petty need to feel good about voting for Obama?
look, i think she'll do fine during the debates. i think she's doing as best she can on the national stage with what little experience she has on the national stage.
i want a person like her in the VP office where she doesn't have to sparkle in front of the likes of Couric or Gibson or Mathews or O'rielly to make people like you, who already want to demonize WHOEVER McCain would have picked regardless, so she can do some real work for this country.
she's not a 35 year beltway insider. if she says she's gonna shake things up in office, i believe she won't be able to prevent shasking things up.
you would character assasinate anybody McCain would have picked. ANYBODY. so forgive me if i don't participate in your Palin circle-jerk.
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium
Big thanks to Opus for his input, otherwise I almost fell for that YouTube video. Because all this time I was wondering why the media hasnt picked up on this alleged Democrats blame game. The facts aren't so factual in the video ... it seems.
you don't fully understand the situation. Opus didn't even scratch the surface. none of that was his anyway.
