|
Australia to implement mandatory internet censorship (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| josh4 |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
LOL, we just got rid of the extreme right government! :rolleyes: |
Well you need to get rid of whoever is pushing this as well
Ah this is what I saw, what a slippery slope.
| quote: | Liberal democracies aren't generally pleased with massive state-run mandatory Internet filtering schemes, but Australia's government is plowing ahead with just such a project. Stoking fears that such a scheme could easily blacklist legal content from all Australians, one national politician has now called for precisely that sort of a blacklist. Under the "Family First" party's scheme, hardcore sex and drug content would be added to the list of "illegal" content, even though they are actually legal for adults to view offline.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/pos...banned-too.html |
|
|
|
| culorut |
Brought to you from an Australian 9/11 truther PKC, ;)
Australians For A Free Internet
http://www.afafi.org
This will be a broad based, grass roots hub for social activism, with the focus on internet freedom.
The two main issues we will be confronting are :
1. Preserving Net Neutrality
2. Opposing the implementation of ISP based filtering systems.
The whole point of this website will be to educate and inform the general public and ultimately to change the policy of the federal government on internet freedom.
We will engage with all the arguments, and through intensive social activism at all levels we will attempt to gain the support of the Australian population to enshrine and protect internet freedom as a fundamental pillar of our society.
This campaign will not be directly tied to 9/11 Truth in any way. The aim is to make the membership as broad as possible.
More information will be provided soon. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
You should use google, it's your friend. The number of Aussies who believe the official story is horse is undeniable.
Of course you live under a rock so..... |
yes, the number is undeniable. and its a ing pathetically low number you asshat. go to the 911oz site, there are 59 active members LOL. deny those numbers assclown! :stongue: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Brought to you from an Australian 9/11 truther PKC, ;)
Australians For A Free Internet
http://www.afafi.org
This will be a broad based, grass roots hub for social activism, with the focus on internet freedom.
The two main issues we will be confronting are :
1. Preserving Net Neutrality
2. Opposing the implementation of ISP based filtering systems.
The whole point of this website will be to educate and inform the general public and ultimately to change the policy of the federal government on internet freedom.
We will engage with all the arguments, and through intensive social activism at all levels we will attempt to gain the support of the Australian population to enshrine and protect internet freedom as a fundamental pillar of our society.
This campaign will not be directly tied to 9/11 Truth in any way. The aim is to make the membership as broad as possible.
More information will be provided soon. |
what a ing joke. they're already lightyears behind the real opposition:
http://nocleanfeed.com/
trust you to be behind the eightball! |
|
|
| culorut |
| What ever troll, fight the power! |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
What ever troll, fight the power! |
yeah, me and my 59 buddies will get right on it! |
|
|
| DJ Shibby |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
wow, for once you and i might be on the same side of an issue!
im writing to my local MPs as well as the relevant senator. an absolute disgrace. |
If you suddenly stop posting on tranceaddict, we'll know why. :( |
|
|
| HardTranceProd |
wow, this is... unexpected. Australia? WTF?
what gives? have there been some recent developments we haven't seen? |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | yeah, me and my 59 buddies will get right on it! |
You will need all the help you can get on the issue you idiot.
Ignorance gets you no where, enjoy your internet.
;) |
|
|
| DJ Shibby |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
A couple points.
1. I am biased because I feel information and data should be free to exchange. Although I find the acts of child pornography and malicious data (viruses etc..) to be very bad. I think those things which are not directly malicious although potentially against some peoples tastes to do so.
I think an opt in filter is OK. Eg. someone can say, no porn, or no child porn, or no viruses, or no illegal content etc.. However, quickly when people start asking for their child porn buffer to be lifted, it may be a clear indicator that maybe this person is somehow involved in child porn or a perv - but they could be writting a research paper on the subject.
However, who exactly is building this filter, - and how much money would it cost.
All in all I'm not in support of a filter--- but one must ask, well isn't reality filtered to begin with? What exactly makes life. Would this filter do anything to take down these sites?
Why doesn't the government just knock down the truely illegal sites? Rather than censor them? |
Child porn is the scapegoat for the law.
In reality, the government wants the free study of alchemy stopped, as governments have for a millennia now.
It is the self studied chemist which bakes up new bombs and drugs, and the internet holds "dangerous" amounts of information on all things. It's okay if you work for them, but independent contractors ARE NOT WANTED!
Have no doubt that this ban will sweep to political deviances, if it hasn't already.
Another question this raises is: If your internet was censored without your knowing and being alerted to it, how would you ever find out? |
|
|
| Magnetonium |
Aren't the British implementing a similar system? I posted some articles on Britons' freedom plunge recently. And yes, it does include monitoring of the internet ... not as blunt as the Australian one, I suppose. |
|
|
|
|
