|
Was this ever posted here?
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Shakka |
If so, what of it?
| quote: | U.S. removes 'yellowcake' from Iraq
Last major stockpile from Saddam's nuclear efforts arrives in Canada
The Associated Press
updated 6:57 p.m. ET, Sat., July. 5, 2008
The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program — a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.
What's now left is the final and complicated push to clean up the remaining radioactive debris at the former Tuwaitha nuclear complex about 12 miles south of Baghdad — using teams that include Iraqi experts recently trained in the Chernobyl fallout zone in Ukraine.
"Everyone is very happy to have this safely out of Iraq," said a senior U.S. official who outlined the nearly three-month operation to The Associated Press. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.
While yellowcake alone is not considered potent enough for a so-called "dirty bomb" — a conventional explosive that disperses radioactive material — it could stir widespread panic if incorporated in a blast. Yellowcake also can be enriched for use in reactors and, at higher levels, nuclear weapons using sophisticated equipment.
The Iraqi government sold the yellowcake to a Canadian uranium producer, Cameco Corp., in a transaction the official described as worth "tens of millions of dollars." A Cameco spokesman, Lyle Krahn, declined to discuss the price, but said the yellowcake will be processed at facilities in Ontario for use in energy-producing reactors.
"We are pleased ... that we have taken (the yellowcake) from a volatile region into a stable area to produce clean electricity," he said.
Secret mission
The deal culminated more than a year of intense diplomatic and military initiatives — kept hushed in fear of ambushes or attacks once the convoys were under way: first carrying 3,500 barrels by road to Baghdad, then on 37 military flights to the Indian Ocean atoll of Diego Garcia and finally aboard a U.S.-flagged ship for a 8,500-mile trip to Montreal.
And, in a symbolic way, the mission linked the current attempts to stabilize Iraq with some of the high-profile claims about Saddam's weapons capabilities in the buildup to the 2003 invasion.
Accusations that Saddam had tried to purchase more yellowcake from the African nation of Niger — and an article by a former U.S. ambassador refuting the claims — led to a wide-ranging probe into Washington leaks that reached high into the Bush administration.
Tuwaitha and an adjacent research facility were well known for decades as the centerpiece of Saddam's nuclear efforts.
Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said.
U.S. and Iraqi forces have guarded the 23,000-acre site — surrounded by huge sand berms — following a wave of looting after Saddam's fall that included villagers toting away yellowcake storage barrels for use as drinking water cisterns.
Yellowcake is obtained by using various solutions to leach out uranium from raw ore and can have a corn meal-like color and consistency. It poses no severe risk if stored and sealed properly. But exposure carries well-documented health concerns associated with heavy metals such as damage to internal organs, experts say.
"The big problem comes with any inhalation of any of the yellowcake dust," said Doug Brugge, a professor of public health issues at the Tufts University School of Medicine.
Hurdles ahead of hauling yellowcake
Diplomats and military leaders first weighed the idea of shipping the yellowcake overland to Kuwait's port on the Persian Gulf. Such a route, however, would pass through Iraq's Shiite heartland and within easy range of extremist factions, including some that Washington claims are aided by Iran. The ship also would need to clear the narrow Strait of Hormuz at the mouth of the Gulf, where U.S. and Iranian ships often come in close contact.
Kuwaiti authorities, too, were reluctant to open their borders to the shipment despite top-level lobbying from Washington.
An alternative plan took shape: shipping out the yellowcake on cargo planes.
But the yellowcake still needed a final destination. Iraqi government officials sought buyers on the commercial market, where uranium prices spiked at about $120 per pound last year. It's currently selling for about half that. The Cameco deal was reached earlier this year, the official said.
At that point, U.S.-led crews began removing the yellowcake from the Saddam-era containers — some leaking or weakened by corrosion — and reloading the material into about 3,500 secure barrels.
In April, truck convoys started moving the yellowcake from Tuwaitha to Baghdad's international airport, the official said. Then, for two weeks in May, it was ferried in 37 flights to Diego Garcia, a speck of British territory in the Indian Ocean where the U.S. military maintains a base.
On June 3, an American ship left the island for Montreal, said the official, who declined to give further details about the operation.
The yellowcake wasn't the only dangerous item removed from Tuwaitha.
Earlier this year, the military withdrew four devices for controlled radiation exposure from the former nuclear complex. The lead-enclosed irradiation units, used to decontaminate food and other items, contain elements of high radioactivity that could potentially be used in a weapon, according to the official. Their Ottawa-based manufacturer, MDS Nordion, took them back for free, the official said.
Saddam's stockpile
The yellowcake was the last major stockpile from Saddam's nuclear efforts, but years of final cleanup is ahead for Tuwaitha and other smaller sites.
The U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency plans to offer technical expertise.
Last month, a team of Iraqi nuclear experts completed training in the Ukrainian ghost town of Pripyat, which once housed the Chernobyl workers before the deadly meltdown in 1986, said an IAEA official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the decontamination plan has not yet been publicly announced.
But the job ahead is enormous, complicated by digging out radioactive "hot zones" entombed in concrete during Saddam's rule, said the IAEA official. Last year, an IAEA safety expert, Dennis Reisenweaver, predicted the cleanup could take "many years."
The yellowcake issue also is one of the many troubling footnotes of the war for Washington.
A CIA officer, Valerie Plame, claimed her identity was leaked to journalists to retaliate against her husband, former Ambassador Joe Wilson, who wrote that he had found no evidence to support assertions that Iraq tried to buy additional yellowcake from Niger.
A federal investigation led to the conviction of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/ |
|
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | | "We are pleased ... that we have taken (the yellowcake) from a volatile region into a stable area to produce clean electricity," |
That pretty much sums up the article quite nicely right there...
Awesome!  |
|
|
| Capitalizt |
damn Saddam...ni**er stole my cake!
 |
|
|
| Krypton |
| Lol, if it's so secret, why the are we hearing about. This is ing government propaganda. Like Iran needs to rely on smuggling Iraqi yellow cake "to aid their nuclear ambitions". LOL. What a ing joke!!:haha: :haha: |
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Lol, if it's so secret, why the are we hearing about. This is ing government propaganda. Like Iran needs to rely on smuggling Iraqi yellow cake "to aid their nuclear ambitions". LOL. What a ing joke!!:haha: :haha: |
it hasn't been a secret since this summer, when i posted it >HERE<
why are you bringing up Iran?:rolleyes: did you even read Shakka's article? |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
it hasn't been a secret since this summer, when i posted it >HERE<
why are you bringing up Iran?:rolleyes: did you even read Shakka's article? |
Did you? Because it mentions Iran... "smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions," as if Iran is employing smugglers to obtain their uranium. This is such an obvious example of government propaganda, it's ridiculous. But since it comes from the government sources, I'm not surprised you eat it right up. The word "official" appears 12 times in that article, and the only sources are unnamed 'officials'. Nice way for a so-called journalist to regurgitate what the government wants us to hear. I thought that was what news wires were for, not reporting. I'm not saying the event never happened. My complaint is the obvious bias in the way it was written. It's so blatantly obvious.
I've got an idea. Why don't the Associated Press just name all of their articles, "What officials say...":haha: :haha:
said a senior U.S. official
The official spoke
the official described
the official said.
Iraqi government officials
the official said.
the official said.
said the official
according to the official.
the official said.
said an IAEA official
said the IAEA official. |
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Did you? Because it mentions Iran... "smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions," as if Iran is employing smugglers to obtain their uranium. This is such an obvious example of government propaganda, it's ridiculous. But since it comes from the government sources, I'm not surprised you eat it right up. The word "official" appears 12 times in that article, and the only sources are unnamed 'officials'. Nice way for a so-called journalist to regurgitate what the government wants us to hear. I thought that was what news wires were for, not reporting. I'm not saying the event never happened. My complaint is the obvious bias in the way it was written. It's so blatantly obvious.
I've got an idea. Why don't the Associated Press just name all of their articles, "What officials say...":haha: :haha:
said a senior U.S. official
The official spoke
the official described
the official said.
Iraqi government officials
the official said.
the official said.
said the official
according to the official.
the official said.
said an IAEA official
said the IAEA official. |
so the whole crux of your argument here is doubt based on your incessant, childish rejection of authority? |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
so the whole crux of your argument here is doubt based on your incessant, childish rejection of authority? |
Rejection of authority? Damn, if I ever saw a straw man argument...;)
I question authority, I don't reject it...:rolleyes:
As for this reporter...who never questioned any "officials", but simply regurgitated what they said, I hardly call that journalism...:o |
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Rejection of authority? Damn, if I ever saw a straw man argument...;)
I question authority, I don't reject it...:rolleyes:
As for this reporter...who never questioned any "officials", but simply regurgitated what they said, I hardly call that journalism...:o |
whatever. so you're saying this story never happened? |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
whatever. so you're saying this story never happened? |
lol, "whatever." That's all you've got to say huh?...:p
Another straw man. You're on a role m8...;)
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Did you? Because it mentions Iran... "smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions," as if Iran is employing smugglers to obtain their uranium. This is such an obvious example of government propaganda, it's ridiculous. But since it comes from the government sources, I'm not surprised you eat it right up. The word "official" appears 12 times in that article, and the only sources are unnamed 'officials'. Nice way for a so-called journalist to regurgitate what the government wants us to hear. I thought that was what news wires were for, not reporting. I'm not saying the event never happened. My complaint is the obvious bias in the way it was written. It's so blatantly obvious.
I've got an idea. Why don't the Associated Press just name all of their articles, "What officials say...":haha: :haha:
said a senior U.S. official
The official spoke
the official described
the official said.
Iraqi government officials
the official said.
the official said.
said the official
according to the official.
the official said.
said an IAEA official
said the IAEA official. |
|
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
lol, "whatever." That's all you've got to say huh?...:p
Another straw man. You're on a role m8...;) |
so what is your point in this thread?
explain this "blatant bias" to me as if i'm a fourth grader. whom or what does this "bias" favor? |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
so what is your point in this thread?
explain this "blatant bias" to me as if i'm a fourth grader. whom or what does this "bias" favor? |
What's my point? I just had to point out the blantantly obvious propaganda which this article is. I mean re-read my bloody posts. Iran smuggling Iraqi uranium? LOL...PUHLEASEEEEE. Blatant bias you ask? I dunno, perhaps you could...hmmm...examine the sources? All of them unnamed. All of them government officials. What I imply from the article is this message. "We have made Iraq safer." This couldn't be farther from the truth. |
|
|
|
|
