|
Hopeandchange discounted 63%
|
View this Thread in Original format
| The17sss |
85 of the 135 (63%) of the memebers of Obama's agency review teams are now Clinton retreads. A glorious discount of Hopeandchange in time for the holidays. I know it's a fishbowl in Washington, but clearly he could have found other people with fresh ideas.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/...e-clinton-ties/
"Here's how you can tell the campaign is over and done with," wrote Ben Smith and Carrie Budoff Brown in Politico. "Clintonites are everywhere." |
|
|
| Groundhog Boy |
| Where would you like anyone with experience to come from, the Carter administration? |
|
|
| Lebezniatnikov |
| Haha, seriously. If they didn't come from the Clinton administration, we'd have the17sss crying about how inexperienced the Obama administration looked. Wouldn't be the PDD without him copying and pasting something that isn't even an issue. |
|
|
| Lebezniatnikov |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
85 of the 135 (63%) of the memebers of Obama's agency review teams are now Clinton retreads. A glorious discount of Hopeandchange in time for the holidays. I know it's a fishbowl in Washington, but clearly he could have found other people with fresh ideas.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/...e-clinton-ties/
"Here's how you can tell the campaign is over and done with," wrote Ben Smith and Carrie Budoff Brown in Politico. "Clintonites are everywhere." |
I find it amusing that you've chosen to misquote in your signature in order to make a political point (once again). |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
isn't even an issue. |
precisely. i really hope these guys manage to find some real points of contention in the next 8 years. |
|
|
| Capitalizt |
| Clinton people? F*ck!! I hope we don't have another 8 years of peace and prosperity like we did in the 90's.. |
|
|
| guerra-monstru |
| quote: | Originally posted by Capitalizt
Clinton people? F*ck!! I hope we don't have another 8 years of peace and prosperity like we did in the 90's.. |
Right, because the US never bombed Serbia or Iraq killing innocent civilians. If not more then just the same number as Bush administration has. |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
I find it amusing that you've chosen to misquote in your signature in order to make a political point (once again). |
I find it amusing that you're obese. But that's besides the point. It is an exact quote, face. It is the 2007 winning entry from an annual contest at Texas A&M University calling for the most appropriate definition of a contemporary term.
And, what's the problem with me making political points anyway? That's all you ing do... other than stuff your face full of carbs and confections, that is. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by guerra-monstru
Right, because the US never bombed Serbia or Iraq killing innocent civilians. If not more then just the same number as Bush administration has. |
they were all thoroughly-justified attacks. |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by Groundhog Boy
Where would you like anyone with experience to come from, the Carter administration? |
I'm not saying that have to come from the Carter Administration... or the Clinton administration.... it's all about the IDEA of real change, and Obama's own words (paraphrasing) talked about the opposite of change being simply moving around the same old players in Washington into different chairs. There are plenty of new, qualified people with legislative or policy experience throughout the country with fresh and like minded ideas that he could have tapped for this "change", but he didn't, and that's the point. |
|
|
| DJ Shibby |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
>>>>>Texas<<<<< |
I'd like to point out that this forum has a set of rules that you should re-read; this isn't the cor, even though there's been a good migration there since things seemed to lighten up a bit with Obama's victory. |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Shibby
I'd like to point out that this forum has a set of rules that you should re-read; this isn't the cor, even though there's been a good migration there since things seemed to lighten up a bit with Obama's victory. |
I assume you're referring to this--->
No Argumenta Ad Hominem: Hopefully, this is just temporary, but let's try to avoid any name-calling and/or personal attacks. We're here to discuss about politics, not to show how many insults we know in a determined language. At the slightest provocation, the necessary measures will be taken to solve the problem.
Single me out and make an example of me if you wish, but where were you backing me up the times I had been told to F off and die, die a slow death from AIDS/cancer, referred to as an ignorant , etc. by certain members during my many months in the PDD? Is that not Ad Hominem?
My response was aimed at Lebz that way because as always, he finds it necessary to comment on anything I say with an air of condescending arrogance and intellectual superiority, and frankly it pisses me off. There are plenty of other people who share his political views that I get along with fine because they don't think they are better than everyone else. So, if I broke the rule I'm sorry and I won't do it again, but let's call it both ways in the future ok? |
|
|
|
|
