Originally posted by culorut
You believe a building collapsed straight down for the first time in history in that fashion and make fun of others when the only way to justify it is some trash paper from NIST?
Yea, it did collapse straight down. Are you telling me it didn't :p? The NIST report is the most conclusive, scientific, report regarding this issue. You and your ilk's pathetic attempts to discredit it are laughable. Your alternative, controlled demolition, is fallacious, presents a false dichotomy, and has no physical evidence with which to present. We generally call such views "fairy tales"...;)
quote:
Where is the building that slammed into WTC7 to cause it to fall then? Just talk if you cannot back it up champ. The very report you posted from NIST does not mention that this caused the collapse, they blame it on over exaggerated office fires and thermal expansion.
Um, it's called the twin towers. What caused the fires and structural damage? I'll give you a hint. Two 100 story skyscrapers fell in the very near vicinity..
quote:
How come no other buildings have come down due to office fires and thermal expansion in the same fashion as WTC7, should be easy to answer as there have been many buildings on fire much stronger than WTC7 but not one of you has been able to yet....
I don't know. Why does that matter? Your argument is fallacious. Because some buildings didn't collapse, this must mean WTC7 shouldn't have either? LOL. No, wrong.
quote:
And don't give me BS about the buildings are built differently, WTC7 housed some serious tenants (CIA, Secret Service, IRS, etc) and was a bunker in case of emergency. It was built much better.
So basically, you'r saying WTC7 was an unsinkable ship? They also said that about the Titanic, and guess what, it sank. Just because a building is well designed does not mean it can't collapse...
culorut
Office fires and debris? LOL, yeah right.
culorut
Reminds me of something....flashes, timing, it's bang on.
culorut
reminds of something again.....
culorut
Why are the above companies wasting all these man hours installing cutting charges when all they have to do is light a match to cause "thermal expansion" according to NIST?
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Office fires and debris? LOL, yeah right.
That's it. "Yea right." LOL. And a pointless video! Wow, it proves EVERYTHING now! :rolleyes:
Here's some news. Your videos prove nothing.
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Why are the above companies wasting all these man hours installing cutting charges when all they have to do is light a match to cause "thermal expansion" according to NIST?
You tell me. You'r the one who thinks whatever (you still haven't named them) set the tonnes of explosives needed (still no evidence of such) could do it without anyone noticing.
ANd once again. Reading comprehension. It wasn't just fire that caused the collapse. It was several other factors combined, which you conviently ignore.
culorut
Yeah, bang on again...Stick to NIST's fairy tale if you want.
WTC7 controlled demolition, side-by-side video
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Who did that? Cause that's retarded.
It's stupid to compare any two structures that aren't architecturally similar. It's also stupid to say "no building has ever in the history of the world fallen due to fire."
culorut
Actually it's scary just how exact the video shows two buildings being demolished in the same way.
quote:
It's stupid to compare any two structures that aren't architecturally similar. It's also stupid to say "no building has ever in the history of the world fallen due to fire."
No it's stupid to say that other buildings have fallen due to fire, find one already or stop talking nonsense. It has never happened in history, never. (only on 9/11 according to NIST)
If you find at least one other building that has collapsed in the same manner like WTC7 did due to a fire post it here and I will give you a thousand dollars no questions asked.
Cannot be that hard can it?
:eek:
culorut
Photos really do say a million words. Everything untouched but the insurance policy, how convenient.
Lira
Culorut, double/triple post just once again, and this thread will be automatically closed. Tabbed browsing does wonders.
Also, unless someone manages to explain (coherently) what the hell an ordinary fire has to do with a building that collapsed after an air plane flew into it, this thread shall also be closed tomorrow morning.
Next thing you know, someone's going to ask why Australia hasn't collapsed yet! Maybe a plane even crashed in the outback, further proving their point!
